Debate over the Sunshine Act, which Speaker Philip Gunn introduced last week and failed on a technicality later in the week, continued to rain down on the Legislature as a House committee returned the issue on Monday.
Legislative Republicans have framed the measure as providing greater transparency to the way state agencies handle the hiring of outside firms for legal work. If passed, the law would empower state agencies, boards and commissions to bypass the state attorney general, Mississippi's chief legal officer, and pick their own lawyers.
Democrats think the GOP is simply trying to slap Attorney General Jim Hood for being an annoyance to the Republican-power establishment. Most recently, Hood sought to invalidate Gov. Haley Barbour's pardons; Barbour remains popular in GOP circles. Marty Wiseman, director of the John C. Stennis Institute on Government, thinks the issue goes deeper than run-of-the-mill partisan sniping.
Wiseman explained that the 1890 Mississippi Constitution created a weak executive because whites feared that with their numbers, blacks might have been able to elect the state's governor.
As a result, Wiseman said, "the attorney general is the statutorily most powerful person in the state." In this case, that person just happens to be Hood, the only statewide Democratic officeholder. While he thinks Hood has been largely nonpartisan in the way his office pursues cases, Wiseman said Republicans want to "neuter" the AG nonetheless.
At Monday's meeting 45-minute-long House Judiciary A hearing, members gave Hood the chance to argue against the bill. At the very least, he estimates an additional $11 million in additional cost to the state based on the $65 per hour the AG bills agencies and the $130 per hour private firms charge.
In its reincarnated form, as HB 211, the act went a step further than the previous version to scale back the powers of the AG by incorporating process whereby the state Personal Service Contract Review Board must approve certain contracts. The previous bill called for the board to serve as a clearinghouse for contracts more than $100,000.
Republicans dismissed Hood's argument that the state would incur higher costs because agency directors would still have to work within the budgets the Legislature gives them.
"It's about giving agencies greater flexibility and independence," state Auditor Stacey Pickering said.
Hood also argued that agency directors don't have the legal training to determine if a true conflict exists with his office or to even read legal bills correctly.
"It's important that you get independent advice from an attorney you can't fire," he said.
The bill passed 14-9 out of committee, along a party-line vote. Rep. Mark Baker, R-Brandon, said he had no timeline for bring the bill to a floor vote.
Comments
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.