[Media Talk] Romper Rhetoric | Jackson Free Press | Jackson, MS

[Media Talk] Romper Rhetoric

Sid Salter of The Clarion-Ledger admitted in a Sept. 24 column that his paper might have screwed the pooch on "tort reform" coverage, as we detailed in our last cover story ("Hoodwinked"). But he started out whining about the "crybabies" who question his paper's coverage of the topic. "Wah-wah-wah. Oh, boo-hoo-hoo," he wrote about the critics' complaints.

Salter says the "radicals" are crying because the Ledger is so fair and balanced. (His yardstick: "both" sides found their coverage wanting.) "Their favorite refrain is that the mean old media is misrepresenting the story.' That's French for telling something other than a story that is exclusively biased toward their side's position."

Au contraire. Careful readers know the Ledger chose sides in this debate back in 2001, and has presented the positions of the insurance industry and the U.S. Chamber with crystal-clear precision. It's the side of the people (and any doctor who doesn't believe that their premiums are all about lawsuits) that hasn't gotten much play—as cited by Congress' non-partisan GAO.

After the sniveling intro, Salter seems to admit to the poor coverage, quoting (but not refuting) the GAO: "Media reports—some published by The Clarion-Ledger—of Mississippi doctors relocating, retiring or closing practices 'were not accurate or involved relatively few physicians,' the report found. The GAO report noted that in Mississippi, physicians reportedly leaving the state represented 1 percent of all physicians licensed in Mississippi."

Salter then beat a quick retreat from that admission back to more comfortable territory, lifting a few sentences from an e-mail that attorney Merrida Coxwell send the Clarion-Ledger about the JFP's cover story. Salter's answer to Coxwell? "Sob. Sniffle. Boo-hoo." Seriously. Salter, who probably more than anyone else has framed this issue into a lawyers-vs.-doctors brawl, then used the same "Manufactured Crisis" subhead we used in our cover story, added a question mark, and lightly skated through the GAO's points, muddling the findings (that stipulated the premiums are too high) along the way and saying that there hasn't been enough time for the malpractice premiums to start their dramatic descent. (Go talk to California.)

He ended by swiping at the Mississippi Medical Association for criticizing The Ledger's editorial that appeared the day after our article, actually agreeing with us (again, not by name) that the Legislature should now investigate the insurance industry. Granted, the letter belittled the GAO's findings, but MMA must have felt sucker-punched by such a good friend.

Suddenly, to hear Salter tell it, the doctors are crybabies now, too. I have an idea: let's all just ignore him from now on. Isn't that the way the French deal with temper tantrums?

Previous Commentsshow

What's this?

Support our reporting -- Follow the MFP.

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.