PROS• Merit pay raises the professionalism bar because teachers are evaluated based on the effectiveness of other teachers.
• It gives principals the authority to make smart hiring and firing decisions.
•Merit pay has arguably seen success in North Carolina, Chattanooga, Dallas and Denver schools.
• Raising the pay levels of the best teachers is key to meeting the challenges, legal and otherwise, of improving schools.
• Rewarding quality teaching will attract the best and the brightest to the profession.
CONS
• Research regularly shows that merit pay doesn't improve teachers' classroom work, and can divide, and add negativity and distrust, to a school's teaching community.
• Merit pay isn't fair: How can you reward one teacher for advances made by a student who has had many teachers? How can you know exactly how each teacher contributed to the student's success?
• Merit pay will contribute to more competition and less teamwork among teachers.
• Teachers don't tend to be money-driven, although they enjoy larger paychecks. A 2000 Public Agenda survey of 900 new teachers found that other considerations are "significantly more important" to most educators.
• There are ways to achieve the same goals, such as "[r]ewarding teachers based on added responsibilities, team leadership, mentorship, and the like, is a form of compensation that recognizes teacher effort without the deleterious effects of merit pay," Scholastic Administrator states.
This list was partially adapted from Scholastic Administrator (scholastic.com).
More like this story
Support our reporting -- Follow the MFP.
