The NY Times reports: "A federal judge ruled yesterday that a lawsuit that accuses Wal-Mart Stores Inc. of discriminating against women can proceed as a class action covering about 1.6 million current and former employees, making it by far the largest workplace-bias lawsuit in United States history. The lawsuit, brought in 2001 by six women, accuses Wal-Mart of systematically paying women less than men and offering women fewer opportunities for promotion. The lawsuit stated that while 65 percent of Wal-Mart's hourly employees are women, only 33 percent of Wal-Mart's managers are.
"While not ruling on the merits of the lawsuit, the judge, Martin J. Jenkins of the United States District Court in San Francisco, wrote that the case was "historic in nature, dwarfing other employment discrimination cases that came before it."
"Wal-Mart said it would appeal the class-action certification, arguing that the company did not discriminate and that decisions about raises and promotion were made by individual stores, not at the corporate level.
"As the world's largest retailer, Wal-Mart has become the target of dozens of lawsuits regarding off-the-clock work and other employment practices. Indeed, because of its huge size, the company has become a lightning rod for criticism. Famed for its low prices, it has become one of the biggest sellers of products from detergent to DVD's. Wal-Mart's power helps consumers as the company pushes manufacturers and suppliers to reduce prices on many items. But Wal-Mart's influence is at times more far reaching: entertainment companies, for example, say they edit music albums and movies to suit Wal-Mart's conservative sensibilities.
"Such controversies, however, pale compared with the potential the job- discrimination lawsuit has to hurt the company's image and bottom line. Shares of Wal-Mart fell 1.6 percent yesterday in trading on the New York Stock Exchange."
Previous Comments
- ID
- 141113
- Comment
Salon has a good piece on this case today. The abuses at WalMart are amazingly widespread and systemic. There's this: "Howard wrote a letter to the company's head office listing these and other instances of sexual harassment and discrimination. Although she consistently received job ratings that "exceeded expectations", she was paid at a lower rate than male store managers; when she complained, she was offered a job transfer. "My general manager told me my job was home with my daughter." and this: "Women working at Wal-Mart stores are paid less than men in every region," the judge wrote of his decision. "Pay disparities exist in most job categories, the salary gap widens over time, women take longer to enter management positions, and the higher one looks in the organisation, the lower the percentage of women." and this: "Wal-Mart's own data reveals that, on average, women at Wal-Mart were paid $1,400 a year less than men, and female managers $14,000 less."
- Author
- kate
- Date
- 2004-07-12T13:27:16-06:00
More like this story
More stories by this author
- EDITOR'S NOTE: 19 Years of Love, Hope, Miss S, Dr. S and Never, Ever Giving Up
- EDITOR'S NOTE: Systemic Racism Created Jackson’s Violence; More Policing Cannot Stop It
- Rest in Peace, Ronni Mott: Your Journalism Saved Lives. This I Know.
- EDITOR'S NOTE: Rest Well, Gov. Winter. We Will Keep Your Fire Burning.
- EDITOR'S NOTE: Truth and Journalism on the Front Lines of COVID-19
Comments
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
comments powered by Disqus