OK, this is weird. The Clarion-Ledger posted a story earlier today about the mayor's most recent about-face on public records. Now, it seems, he is mad at The Clarion-Ledger again, and refusing to give them records that have anything to do with his "security." Here's the weird part, though: In the story posted earlier, The Clarion-Ledger said that Melton "retracted a personal apology"; now the story says something quite different, with an extra error to boot added to the already passive-ridden sentence about the "apology":
Melton also said when he called the newspaper Wednesday to apology for requests being denied he was mistaken about what requests had been denied.
So, why did they take out the part about the retraction? Either he did, or he didn't.
This is where it gets even stranger, though.
In the next sentence, we get glimmers of what we're hearing out of the city—that it's Danks fighting the City Attorney's office:
Dale Danks, Melton's attorney, said Wednesday the denial letters sent by the city were "without merit."
This is really turned into a circus now: Melton v. Ledge v. City Attorney v. Danks v. Ledge v. Melton.
Remember the lover's spat analogy? "I love you, I love you not. I hate you. I love him. No, I love her. Do you love me?"
(And, yes, we did print the original story.)
Previous Commentsshow
What's this?More like this story
More stories by this author
- EDITOR'S NOTE: 19 Years of Love, Hope, Miss S, Dr. S and Never, Ever Giving Up
- EDITOR'S NOTE: Systemic Racism Created Jackson’s Violence; More Policing Cannot Stop It
- Rest in Peace, Ronni Mott: Your Journalism Saved Lives. This I Know.
- EDITOR'S NOTE: Rest Well, Gov. Winter. We Will Keep Your Fire Burning.
- EDITOR'S NOTE: Truth and Journalism on the Front Lines of COVID-19
Comments
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.