Daylight Curfew? | Jackson Free Press | Jackson, MS

Daylight Curfew?

The Clarion-Ledger ran a piece today about the impact of Melton's state of emergency. The short version is that the state of emergency is more a rhetorical gesture than an actual change in policy.

The article states: While the proclamation declared an earlier curfew for minors by one hour on weeknights and two hours on weekends, police officials said no additional enforcement measures would be taken.

Like the previous curfew, it will be enforced through the regular course of police patrol, Jackson Police Department Cmdr. Lee Vance said.

So, as with the regular youth curfew, the new curfew will only be opportunistically enforced. In other words, most of the time, the police will ignore kids out on the streets after curfew. Is some kid is annoying them, or if they can't get the kid on anything else, then the curfew comes into play. That arbitrary element is one of many reasons why the regular youth curfew ordinance is a clumsy, ill-conceived law.

Another point of absurdity: The mayor changed the weeknight curfew time from 8, which was in the emergency proclamation drafted by the city attorney on Tuesday, to 9. He said he didn't want to deprive youth of the last bit of summer daylight.

"It doesn't really get dark until then. We need to get kids in the house when it's dark," Melton said.

So is this a crisis or not? Is it an emergency or not? If it is, then do we really need to worry about letting kids get the most out of their summertime light? Do we need daylight savings time for an "emergency" crackdown?

There is some nice vitriol from Sheriff McMillan, who says he hasn't talked to Melton in weeks and has not been contacted about the new curfew. "The time to discuss that with me is prior to taking action," McMillin said. "It is inappropriate to announce that and then tell me about it."

There is this bit of nonsense from Sgt. Perry Martin: "The curfew has not been a deterrent in juvenile crime but has been there to help to eliminate some of our criminal activity by young people," Martin said.

Er, what does that mean? My most charitable guess is that he means that youth aren't scared of the curfew but because it allows the police to get kids off the street, it winds up reducing youth crime. The evidence actually points to the opposite--the more youth you have on the street, the less crime there is, because the more people who are out watching, the less opportunity there is for people to mug and steal. This is a consequence of the fact that most young people are not criminals. That point seems to be lost on this administration, however. So, either Martin is making no sense, or he is making a point that is not true.

Finally, there is this bit of craziness from Mayor Melton: "And if this doesn't straighten up, then I will implement a curfew, a daytime curfew, on the kids," he said. "And I will hold the parents accountable."

A daytime curfew? In other words, ban kids from being outside altogether? Yes, that's a great idea.

Previous Commentsshow

What's this?

Support our reporting -- Follow the MFP.

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.