Jackson Free Press

All, after receiving an expletive-filled e-mail from one of our bloggers last week, we have determined that he did not send it. Once again, one of our small group of JFP-haters is stupidly playing games, pretending they are someone else to try to, well, be stupid. And stupid he is—in part of this particular game, he is using a screen name he used years back on this site, which indicates that it's the same person. If you get an odd e-mail, or see something posted on a blog that indicates that the stalker(s) is up to no good, please forward all the information, including IP headers where possible, to us here. We're collecting it all to hand over to the authorities; I believe our harassers will find that this kind of thing is taken more seriously than they might think.

Meantime, angry boys, we're not going away. Give it up, or at least keep the trash on your own Web site where it belongs.

Previous Comments

ID

107768

Comment

Get ready for t he return of Kingfish!

Author

DonnaLadd

Date

2006-10-10T12:04:14-06:00

ID

107769

Comment

Oh King, I truly did miss you, even though you're always wrong. ;)

Author

Brian C Johnson

Date

2006-10-10T12:09:38-06:00

ID

107770

Comment

I missed him, too. And he's only wrong most of the time. ;-)

Author

DonnaLadd

Date

2006-10-10T12:12:33-06:00

ID

107771

Comment

Glad to hear that the King Fish didn't have a complete meltdown on us. Nice that the number of crazy whack jobs seems to have reached a stable, and identifiable, number.

Author

kate

Date

2006-10-10T13:16:05-06:00

ID

107772

Comment

Yep, and the good news (for us, at least) is that it's the same losers over and over again. There are no surprises here. I feel sorry for them, though. One must have a really small life, mind or other necessity to spend time pretending they are someone else online to annoy people they don't agree with. Send huge amounts of compassion their way.

Author

DonnaLadd

Date

2006-10-10T13:23:48-06:00

ID

107773

Comment

Invasion of the Screen Name Snatchers scary...

Author

GLB

Date

2006-10-10T14:44:58-06:00

ID

107774

Comment

Yep, really terrifying. More like: profoundly idiotic. Most likely: a cry for attention and help.

Author

DonnaLadd

Date

2006-10-10T14:46:11-06:00

ID

107775

Comment

I just wanted to say thanks to Ms. Ladd for giving me a chance to explain myself. Said cyberstalker IM'ed me out of the blue this morning with IM's just as vulgar as what was written to Ms. Ladd. Thanks for all the love. Damn. Now its going to be harder for me to be mean to some of you. Let the games begin. ;-)

Author

Kingfish

Date

2006-10-10T15:11:22-06:00

ID

107776

Comment

Bring. It. On. Kingfish. You don't scare us. (Smile)

Author

DonnaLadd

Date

2006-10-10T15:13:04-06:00

ID

107777

Comment

Welcome back, dude. And agreed on folks taking this more seriously than the spoofers seem to think. Hey, geniuses: Ever wonder why more people don't do this? Because it's illegal, and good grounds for a civil defamation suit to boot. Apparently it's going to take a certified letter with a court date on it for y'all to realize what a bad idea this is. Cheers, TH

Author

Tom Head

Date

2006-10-10T15:40:52-06:00

ID

107778

Comment

Missed you, Kingfish. We may all have different views, but there's a place for almost everybody here. :)

Author

Lady Havoc

Date

2006-10-10T15:42:59-06:00

ID

107779

Comment

Yeah, King and I could have gotten it resolved sooner, but I couldn't get my e-mail send out in that damn hotel in San Francisco. For a hotel hosting a Web conference, its service sure wasn't stellar. But, hey. The views, the Blue Angels, the iTodd and me ... no complaints here. (Sorry about the reverie back into my little vacation. Couldn't help myself.)

Author

DonnaLadd

Date

2006-10-10T15:47:57-06:00

ID

107780

Comment

Y'all are going to love this. Little D!ck is at it again. Just got this e-mail disguised to look like my columnist Emily Braden sent it. Apparently, our brilliant villian goes to other blogs and forwards a link so that the intellectual giant can attach a nastygram to me—knowing, of course, that I am of such low self-esteem that a dumba$$ hick doing something ignorant is going to just absolutely ruin my day. Y'all, I know who this is and where they normally post/blog; this stalker has done this kind of crap for years now. Emily Braden has sent you a link to a weblog: Go fuck yourself Ladd. Stick it up your huge fat arse. Blog: David Hampton Post: Education funding Link: http://www.clarionledger.com/misc/blogs/dhampton/2006/11/education-funding.html -- Powered by Blogger ]http://www.blogger.com/

Author

DonnaLadd

Date

2006-11-02T12:41:23-06:00

ID

107781

Comment

doesn't really deserve a response except for "Get a Frickkin' Life, Dude!"

Author

Izzy

Date

2006-11-02T13:44:12-06:00

ID

107782

Comment

Oh. I'm touched! Publicity! Because that's what I tell ALLLLLL my editors. Go fuck yourself! How do I fix this?

Author

emilyb

Date

2006-11-02T14:10:30-06:00

ID

107783

Comment

You don't fix it. They went to The Clarion-Ledger Web site and sent me a link through their site with Hampton's link included. If the Ledge cared to look at IP addresses, they could probably nail the guy—but who knows if they know how?

Author

DonnaLadd

Date

2006-11-02T14:34:43-06:00

ID

107784

Comment

Ahhhh...I get it now. They could have picked a better link! I really like Hampton. One of my goals in life is to give him the promise at Hal and Mal's.

Author

emilyb

Date

2006-11-02T14:48:26-06:00

ID

107785

Comment

I like Hampton, too. Don't respect a lot of his work lately, I'm sorry to say. The column about why they endorsed Bush and Melton is just still stuck in my craw. And where was he when Melton was lying to the judge in Meridian? In the dark? Oh, and he's the one who told us we couldn't respond to Newhouse's open letter implying that members of MIPA committed vandalism on a Ledge employee -- because, ahem, it wasn't reported. Of course, they haven't reported a damn thing about controversy around TDN. Ombudsman, folks, ombudsman. Sorry, I digressed. I do wonder how they're going to deal with folks using their outside and oh-so-sophisticated Blogger system to send obscene messages to their competitors. That's an interesting problem for them, I'd guess.

Author

DonnaLadd

Date

2006-11-02T14:59:33-06:00

ID

107786

Comment

Little D!ck/ess is back today; my day is so ruined. Today's e-mail: You have been sent this message from Tom as a courtesy of Return to Main Page IP address? You are such a dumb bitch. IP addresses mean nothing you dumbass. Since you *know* who this is you don't need an IP address. Right? To view this article, please visit: http://www.jacksonfreepress.com/comments.php?id=11349_0_27_0 EXCLUSIVE: City Attorney In the Money? Everyone join cyber-hands now and pray for this very tragic individual.

Author

DonnaLadd

Date

2006-11-03T10:34:02-06:00

ID

107787

Comment

Ladd: I guess I'm slow on the uptake. Why are you now posting this person's stuff to the site for us to read? Or are you?

Author

GLB

Date

2006-11-03T10:38:39-06:00

ID

107788

Comment

Two reasons: Because I want y'all to know how low certain people will stoop in their hatred of people with different opinions (and many of you will have a strong sense of what camp this is coming from, and has now for about three years). Secondly, should any of you get this kind of fake "forward," you should know that it's not coming from who it says it's coming from. These same people (and, believe me, it's a miniscule contingent) have long tried to launch these petty attacks against the JFP, me, Knol, Kate, Tom, more recently Pike—regular JFP bloggers who they can't stand because we have different opinions from theirs. They've done it in different cyber-forms from posting fake Web sites to flooding our petition against Edgar Ray Killen with nasty and homophobic epithets. They post similar stuff on other Web sites, some which they are directly involved in, some in which they're not. Some have posted really personal stuff on the Internet about me and others around me. I am rather flattered by the attention, and I realized long ago that they could only help the JFP by driving a few people here curious about what we're doing that is so awful. And they have alienated so many people around town with their tactics that I don't need to lift a finger to do anything about it. We've even had conservative advertisers sign on because they say that if we anger people like that so much that we must be creating a real buzz. And if they think that I haven't dealt with a handful of wingnuts (and nutballs) in my business, and am somehow going to be deterred from my work due to such pettiness, they are sadly naive. Truly, more than anything, I feel sorry for this little cadre of folks. Word is that their obsession with the JFP has even affected some of their family lives. And that's truly, truly tragic. I won't post any more of the, however, because there is no need to feed their hunger for attention. However, I did think it was useful to alert y'all to their latest brilliant scheme to put the JFP out of business. (smile)

Author

DonnaLadd

Date

2006-11-03T10:54:01-06:00

ID

107789

Comment

I think the alert was useful, Donna. I adore the way adversity seems to just make you stronger and more alive--you are a great role model. Thank you.

Author

Izzy

Date

2006-11-03T11:45:48-06:00

ID

107790

Comment

"You dumb b--ch"? Oh, great, so he's a misogynist, too. What a wanker. And seconded re: Laurel's comments. Shine on, you crazy diamond! Cheers, TH

Author

Tom Head

Date

2006-11-03T11:58:43-06:00

ID

107791

Comment

What a creep! He should know that two women arguing wouldn't dis each other butt's - big or small! Not to their face at least! ;-) Side note: My comments in no way are a reflection of how Pike views any other posters butt's. Pike is size blind... BTW: What are these new links to "DIGG THIS" and "post to del.icio.us" Feeling behind not knowing!

Author

pikersam

Date

2006-11-03T11:59:13-06:00

ID

107792

Comment

You know, as in Delicious Butt, and Dig This Arse. ;-D OK, not really. The iTodd will explain his new fun techy tool. As for our po witta stalka, such insults are such a sign of desperation—I think it's fascinating how many folks think women are destroyed when they go after your body parts. It's an age-old misogynistic trick that Dickesses use on other women as well. But my self-esteem is strong—and I'm not insulted by such things. I am not perfect, nor need I be in order to be happy and do my job in the world and love others. As for my butt, I'm fine with it. And frankly there are just as many folks out there who like juicier butts as those who like tiny, flat ones. You know what Jill Conner Browne says (generalizing, of course): White men like big tits; black men like big butts. Thus, our SPQ costumes have huge boobs and butts, hitting all the bases. ;-D

Author

DonnaLadd

Date

2006-11-03T12:07:39-06:00

ID

107793

Comment

I guess by that standard, I must have mixed ancestry. ;o) In all seriousness, I really do think women of all body types are beautiful--it's not even something I have to "work at"; I've gotten insane crushes on women who weigh more than I do, and women who weigh half as much--so I just don't get this, except that we live in a culture where women are already beaten up for their looks (whatever their looks are) just for, you know, breathing. Every man with a room-temperature IQ should have a well-worn copy of Naomi Wolf's The Beauty Myth on his dresser, because we're being had, gentlemen, and if you don't want a bunch of old white guys with cigars to decide when you should get an erection, some rigorous self-analysis and mind-expansion is in order. Cheers, TH

Author

Tom Head

Date

2006-11-03T12:48:54-06:00

ID

107794

Comment

My only comment to your post Tom, is this http://galleries.messedup.net/vida_guerra/vida_guerra_pictures_041.jpg

Author

Kingfish

Date

2006-11-03T12:55:13-06:00

ID

107795

Comment

What a creep! He should know that two women arguing wouldn't dis each other butt's - big or small! Not to their face at least! ;-) Maybe to their face, but one of our stalkas was a woman who came on here pretending to be a man. I figured out who she was (and that it was our criticism of tort reform that first got her furious) and even saw her picture and profile on the Internet. And you ought to see the nasty stuff she would write here, thinking I didn't know her identity (actually, you did, before she was suspended. Several times.) So, it's not just a man thang.

Author

DonnaLadd

Date

2006-11-03T13:06:12-06:00

ID

107796

Comment

The black men I know like it ALL. If looking at women's behinds and fronts were a degreed task or undertaking I and my friends would have all obtained doctorates while still in undergraduate school. I've never gotten a good look at Ms. Ladd but I can tell she's fine by the way she writes and reasons. The mind is an extension of the rest of the woman. I saw her once at one of the ACLU's crime fighting meeting wearing white pants and a black top. If said to my self I were single, ten years younger, and still remembered how to fight, I would get in that long line of men hopeful that that other man would mess up and open the door. I don't imagine he plans to mess up either.

Author

Ray Carter

Date

2006-11-03T13:33:50-06:00

ID

107797

Comment

If you were a real man Ray, you would take what you want.

Author

Kingfish

Date

2006-11-03T13:35:42-06:00

ID

107798

Comment

I've always loved full-figured women myself. More cushion for the pushin.

Author

Jeff Lucas

Date

2006-11-03T13:41:46-06:00

ID

107799

Comment

see link above. This thread is going downhill fast when Spinal Tap starts coming into t he picture. the bigger the cushion...the sweeter the pushin...

Author

Kingfish

Date

2006-11-03T13:43:18-06:00

ID

107800

Comment

Tom, I think I love you for nailing the Beauty Myth/Women's Sufferage angle. Hooray for male feminists!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Author

Izzy

Date

2006-11-03T14:30:20-06:00

ID

107801

Comment

Fish we got morals, respect, and friendships to uphold. I don't roll like the republicans. Fish, you're crazier than I am.

Author

Ray Carter

Date

2006-11-03T14:32:11-06:00

ID

107802

Comment

It's not Republicanism, per se, that's the problem. There are good Republicans. It's the schmucks, racists, hypocrites and moneychangers they've let take over the party that's the problem. Deals with the devil stink.

Author

DonnaLadd

Date

2006-11-03T14:42:00-06:00

ID

107803

Comment

Boy, is this thread careeneing all over creation! Thanks for answering my quetison Ladd. I was just curious. My guess is the best tactic is generally to ignore discourteous people like your cyberstalker friend. It doesn't make them go away...but it does render them entirely irrelevant. But I guess you felt you needed to just give some examples, so people know what to look for.

Author

GLB

Date

2006-11-03T14:56:11-06:00

ID

107804

Comment

Fish knew I was only messing with him. He sho' is quiet today.

Author

Ray Carter

Date

2006-11-03T15:07:45-06:00

ID

107805

Comment

Honey chile, I've been ignoring these cads much of the last three years! (Except when I couldn't because their stunts were hurting other people.) But I do want people know not to get upset about juvenile stunts like this. They are sound and fury. Otherwise, this thread started with pond scum, so I'm not sure how we could expect it to be anything but what it is. ;-D

Author

DonnaLadd

Date

2006-11-03T15:20:54-06:00

ID

107806

Comment

Funny you mention pond scum...I've been working on water quality stuff all day. Even my avocational interests can't get me away from the sewer today. {:)

Author

GLB

Date

2006-11-03T15:54:47-06:00