Jackson Free Press

Read Adam Lynch's breaking story that first revealed Mayor Frank Melton's Aug. 26 alleged rampage on Ridgeway Street in Jackson—the accusations that led to felony indictions of Melton and his bodyguards two weeks later on Sept. 15. Adam's story first appeared the afternoon of Sept. 1, 2006. You can read Lynch's exclusive interview with victim Evans Welch here. The JFP also broke the story about Evans Welch's schizophrenia here.

See the JFP's full archive of Melton stories here
View photos of Ridgeway Street duplex destruction.

Previous Commentsshow

You guys should begin expanding your trophy case: the excellence in journalism awards are sure to come! In investigating and reporting the story and then 'staying on the case', you've done this city a helluva public service, for which we should all be grateful. I know I am.

Kacy

Sep 17 2006

Thanks, Kacy.

DonnaLadd

Sep 17 2006

What are the real chances of Mr. Melton's resignation? Does anyone think that he will see the light and step down this week, or is he likely to push for a trial and drag Jackson through agony? If he does not step down, Jackson cannot progress with anything.

tombarnes

Sep 17 2006

he's not quitting. book it.

Kingfish

Sep 17 2006

Yeah, there is someone who called Kim Wade on Thursday; but, that just doesn't count even if it proves to be true a day later. You cannot take what a caller says on talk radio as fact unless it is about a proven prior story. Plus talk radio is not "news" but rather entertainment based on topical stories. The JFP was the breaking news outlet on this story. WLBT was a close second. What is disturbing is that other media outlets were told about the story before Friday, and none of them wanted to pick it up until Adam started poking around. Word is the CL had a tip off on Monday and they were the LAST outlet to cover the story. Now they are trying to be on the fore front by telling stories about Melton that should have been covered before the election! I think now that WLBT is admitting that children under Melton's care were apt to steal and used a WLBT vehicle to rob a woman, then they did not do their journalistic duty as a news service when reporting on Melton during the campaign!

pikersam

Sep 17 2006

I believe that Melton will resign. He has a history of doing the exact opposite of what he says that he will do. I believe that the DA has only just begun to put pressure on Melton for his past actions. Peterson mentioned that there could be as many as ten officers charged for their participation in the Ridgeway street incident. Melton may want to fight, but if that many officers are involved then someone will break rank and try and save themselves. There is probably a lot that has gone on that the public is not aware of and these officers are. Melton does not need a law enforcement officer to start talking about his past. Melton also IMO has to tie up some loose ends before he leaves. So why not put on a stiff upper lip and see who will blink first. I remember reading that the AG has guranteed Melton that he will do jail time if he does not take a plea deal. Those are very strong words that Hood must be able to backup or his political future is over.

lance

Sep 17 2006

Is it just me, or is the CL trying to suck up to Melton again in today's headlines (9/17/06)? Is the love affair on again between these two or what? They seem almost as if they want this all to stop and let's cannonize Frank as if he were a saint.

lance

Sep 17 2006

Lance, did you bother to read the whole newspaper? On the editorial page, Salter, Agnew, Stringfellow, Hampton all make it clear he needs to go.

Kingfish

Sep 17 2006

"I believe that Melton will resign. He has a history of doing the exact opposite of what he says that he will do." Agreed... That crossed my mind, too. And it's not like people have conjured up some case. This man has broken the law at will. There's an incredibly good chance that he'll end up in (PMITA) prison... I would say that just resigning his post as mayor would be a much more attractive option...for EVERYBODY involved.

millhouse

Sep 17 2006

Right, Pike. One of the same sources who says she told the Ledger about the story on *Monday* after it happened, she says, also called Kim Wade Show on Thursday. That was a story tip, and she was doing everything she could to get someone to do the story by calling it around. She is a hero, as a result. (We didn't hear the show that day, and Adam was already working on the story anyway.) But a story tip isn't the same thing as a news story that has been researched with eyewitness accounts and responses from officials in it. That was the story that Adam broke on Friday and then WLBT five hours later. I will say that I am proud to stand, again, with Kim Wade as the first two media outlets to talk about an important story in Jackson. The thing that riles is WLBT saying outright that they "broke" the story. That just didn't happen. My reporter works too hard to have another outlet simply try to yank deserved credit right out from under him. It's just not done. But we're talking about that here, so I'll stop. Between that and Newhouse's shenanigan, it does seem that mainstream media are gunning for the JFP this weekend. Wonder why.

DonnaLadd

Sep 17 2006

On the topic of TV news, I should mention that Don Champion just left my office after interviewing me about Melton. That will air tonight (Sunday) at 10 a.m. Check it out.

DonnaLadd

Sep 17 2006

Lance, did you bother to read the whole newspaper? -Kingfish After I had written my blog, I did go back and read everything. I stand corrected.

lance

Sep 17 2006

;-)

Kingfish

Sep 17 2006

To Lance's defense, though, that main piece was puffy. Better than anything they wrote during the campaign, but still puffy. They just don't seem to have a year and a half, or more, of solid reporting to draw on to write a good historical piece.

DonnaLadd

Sep 17 2006

did anyone catch the melton quote denying alcohol use saying that because he is on blood pressure medicine mixing alcohol would kill him.i take benicar and my physician has never told me that my medicine and my whiskey are poison together.in fact i have been encouraged to keep imbibing a glass of wine each night.do you all think melton may have told jerry mitchell a fib?

chimneyville

Sep 17 2006

anyone find it interesting that jerrry mitchell's byline was on the story?

chimneyville

Sep 17 2006

Just asked on my LSU board if its ok to take benicar and drink and a couple of doctors said yes. anyone surprised?

Kingfish

Sep 17 2006

I read the CL columnist, Ronnie Agnew, this am. In his article, A Defiant Melton Must Know the End is Near, Agnew says, "This is not a time for celebration." Those who choose to celebrate wanted to see Melton succeed from the... placing their selfish desires to see him fail in front of a real need to make this city safer and more economically......." I was sicken by this statement! He has a nerve to make such a blanket statement about those who feel no sorrow for this man who has caused so much pain for others. Who exactly is/are the victim(s) here? The CL is tricky and even in their best stories, you don't know what game or what card they are playing. This is troubling because their propaganda continues to fuel the ignorant and the poor. Ignorant is not a bad word: It simply means that one does not know.

justjess

Sep 18 2006

I noticed that, too, justjess. I suspect Mr. Agnew is just trying to make excuses for their own pitiful coverage of Mr. Melton that helped him get this far. It's pure Agnew logic—somehow he knows what's in everyone's else's heads, and it wasn't OK to think it until he started catching on. Actually, Ronnie, smart people can hold more than once thought at a time—feeling sadness about the tragedy of this man, while at the same time feeling relieved, and even happy, that more people are starting to see what he's really about. And don't forget this is the same newspaper that celebrates wildly when "the needle finds its vein" during state executions.

DonnaLadd

Sep 18 2006

Y'all make a good point about the heart medication. A good reporter's next question would have been, "So what heart medication do you take?" Then it would have been easy enough to factcheck his statement.

DonnaLadd

Sep 18 2006

AAN is saluting Adam on their front page right now for breaking the Melton story.

DonnaLadd

Sep 18 2006

Although I haven't watched a lot of national TV in the last few days, I'm a bit surprised that this story hasn't been mentioned on any of the 24hr news channels, particularly in the CNN Headline News ticker or as a follow-up on Keith Obermann's MSNBC show. I realize Jackson is a minor market in a bottom feeder state, but the idea of a mayor being indicted would seem to merit some kind of mention. If it was mentioned I might have missed it while I was in my "MeltonFreeZone" this past weekend.

Jeff Lucas

Sep 18 2006

Saw the head line and a picture on CNN this weekend. Was at the gym so not sure how long the story was mentioned.

guy_in_jackson

Sep 18 2006

Donna, you could have warned me about the giant picture of Melton that was going to greet me over at AAN! It scared the beejeezus out of me! Congrats to Adam, and the JFP.

kate

Sep 18 2006

Sorry. I had the same reaction. I didn't know it was going to be there when I looked. Needless to say, AAN seems proud of one of its smallest members' efforts. ;-)

DonnaLadd

Sep 18 2006

Thanks Donna and a salute to AAN for their salute to Adam.

justjess

Sep 18 2006

GET READY FOR A SHOWDOWN! THE DEMAGOGUES ARE INCITING A RACE RIOT FOR TUESDAY NIGHT'S CITY COUNCIL MEETING!!! While listening to the radio yesterday afternoon, I turned to 1300 AM to listen to a show called “Straight Talk". One of the hosts of the show is councilman Frank Bluntson. Stephanie Parker Weaver (who is not a host) was also on the show. The demagoguery was so thick it was frightening. It also appeared that they were screening calls to allow only Melton supports to get on the air to spew hate. I actually got chills listening to all the hate Frank Bluntson and Parker Weaver were spewing. They were saying that Frank Melton was indicted because he's Black, and that Whites don't want to see Blacks become too powerful. It was also said that those who brought the charges and indictments did so to put him (FM) “back on the plantation” where he belongs. Nothing was said about the “Rule of Law.” It is sad to say, but it appeared that none of the people who called in citing racism understood that Frank Melton allegedly broke laws. Bluntson and Parker-Weaver, aware of this void, took advantage of it and continued to pile it on. Everything was racially charged. It was a feeding frenzy. SCARY! I could not believe what I was hearing. The attacks on the DA, Attorney General, and Sheriff Malcolm McMillan were vicious, vile, and violently racist. During the attacks, Bluntson and Parker-Weaver repeatedly urged ALL Frank Melton supporters to sign up for public comments and to pack City Hall on Tuesday, September 19, at 6:00 p. m. I hope there is extra security at the meeting, because IT'S GOING TO BE UGLY!

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 18 2006

I heard it too, blu_n_a, but I became so disgusted and angry that I turned it off. It was sooooo venemous. The little I heard, they even tried to blame the whole mess on supporters of Harvey Johnson. By their twisted propaganda, Harvey prompted the DA, Sheriff and AG to bring Melton down. What was so stupid, though, was they kept conceding that Melton might not have totally followed the law, but that he was doing what he promised the voters he'd do during the campaign. While I really hope that civility prevails tomorrow night, I somehow get the impression that this group (Jim Evans, Parker-Weaver, Hickingbottom, Bluntson) WANT it to be a disruptive, disorderly spectacle. Oh yeah: Jim Evans (local SCLC Chapter President and husband of City Attorney Sarah O'Reilly-Evans, said that he had been in contact with Dr. Joseph Lowery, National President of SCLC! How ironic!

Kacy

Sep 18 2006

Kacy, did you also hear when Parker-Weaver said the reason Kenneth Stokes is so quiet is because Frank Melton is giving him money for his district. Isn't it illegal for a city council member to accept money from the mayor? Isn't that like, buying votes?

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 18 2006

Yeah, well, some of the worst "leaders" of our past did exactly what they promised voters they would do, too: Ross Barnett, Allen Thompson, Bull Connor, Strom Thurmond, James O. Eastland, and on, and on. That's such B.S. They are treating Jacksonians like fools—trying to convince "the people" that the only way to fight crime is by being a criminal and making kids criminals, too. "The people" aren't that stupid. Demagoguery, indeed.

DonnaLadd

Sep 18 2006

Whoa, blu. Did Parker-Weaver *really* say that? Anyone have a tape? We'd like to hear it, post-haste.

DonnaLadd

Sep 18 2006

Whoa, blu. Did Parker-Weaver *really* say that? Anyone have a tape? We'd like to hear it, post-haste. Yes, she actually said it. I don't have a tape, but you can probably call the station and request a copy of Sunday's show.

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 18 2006

I also heard the friday night show. It left me speechless. I don't know what to call it. I don't expect any of this stuff to work. Peterson, Hood and McMillin are no chumps and the law is on their side. The system is stronger than all the crap coming from that side. There are too many indictments already and McMillin is still investigating. There will clearly be more charges, if necessary. Frank is going to resign or sorely regret it. He will soon tell the supporters to shut the hell up, and let's move on. Frank has been caught with his britches off, and soldier, no matter how loud or how, won't prevail. They will only delay the ineviatable. Don't fret people. The lights have been turned out. Frank and his supporters are now trying to dance in the dark.

Ray Carter

Sep 18 2006

I meant, and his soldiers, no matter how many or how loud won't prevail.

Ray Carter

Sep 18 2006

All, I just found a link to the video where WLBT's Maggie Wade falsely claims that WLBT "broke this story." In fact, she says it twice—once at the beginning and again at the end, when she says "you broke this story two weeks ago today." Except, uh, they didn't. Why don't they just sneak into our offices and steal the art off our walls while they're at it!?! Or take Adam's motorcycle out of the parking lot? (I posted this on two threads; I want people *hear* this video for themselves. Someone let me know if it disappears.)

DonnaLadd

Sep 18 2006

I heard that too, and it troubled me. And she indeed said it twice--not that WLBT BROKE the story, but that Andrew "Has-Been" did. Ole' Has-Been had a sheepish look on his face each time she said it.

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 18 2006

I guess the question is: Did Ms. Wade pull this untruth out off thin air, or did someone tell her to say it? Either way, not good.

DonnaLadd

Sep 18 2006

It would also surprise me if Mr. Husbun would want false claims attached to his name. She might be late in her career, but he's just getting started, it seems. They really need to come clean and correct the statement that they broke the story. It would be simple: "We would like to correct a statement we made on-air Friday night. Andrew Hasbun was the first broadcast reporter to report the Ridgeway events, at 10 p.m. on Sept. 1. Adam Lynch of the Jackson Free Press actually broke the story on their Web site on the afternoon of Sept. 1. We apologize for any misunderstanding." That would be honest, it would be classy, and it would help them save face over this.

DonnaLadd

Sep 18 2006

The demagoguery was so thick it was frightening. It also appeared that they were screening calls to allow only Melton supports to get on the air to spew hate. I actually got chills listening to all the hate Frank Bluntson and Parker Weaver were spewing. They were saying that Frank Melton was indicted because he's Black, and that Whites don't want to see Blacks become too powerful. It was also said that those who brought the charges and indictments did so to put him (FM) “back on the plantation” where he belongs. Nothing was said about the “Rule of Law.” It is sad to say, but it appeared that none of the people who called in citing racism understood that Frank Melton allegedly broke laws. Bluntson and Parker-Weaver, aware of this void, took advantage of it and continued to pile it on. Everything was racially charged. It was a feeding frenzy. SCARY! I could not believe what I was hearing. The attacks on the DA, Attorney General, and Sheriff Malcolm McMillan were vicious, vile, and violently racist. During the attacks, Bluntson and Parker-Weaver repeatedly urged ALL Frank Melton supporters to sign up for public comments and to pack City Hall on Tuesday, September 19, at 6:00 p. m. I hope there is extra security at the meeting, because IT'S GOING TO BE UGLY! Unfortunately, none of this surprises me especially from this crowd. I've been afraid for many years that some of our black leaders are becoming the very demogogues that they rallied against in the 1960s. Power can corrupt even the most honest officials, and I have sensed for the last couple of years from Kenny's tone both on and off camera that he is in danger of falling into the corrupt category. Not on the level of a Tom Delay or anything, but politics does require that people pay tribute if they want votes on key issues, or if they want things to happen in their wards that the previous admins wouldn't go for.

Jeff Lucas

Sep 18 2006

"Did Ms. Wade pull this untruth out off thin air, or did someone tell her to say it?" It was pretty suspicious, especially when she said it the second time. There was something erie about it, and ole Andrew '"Has-Been", with that guilty look on his face, kept his lips shut. I think someone told her (Maggie to say it twice) because they really, really, really wanted people to think that they scooped everybody. What a shame. :(

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 18 2006

Yes, it is a shame. What amazes me is that they think people are going to buy it. They're just going to look bad for trying to claim a story they didn't do first.

DonnaLadd

Sep 18 2006

"...have sensed for the last couple of years from Kenny's tone both on and off camera that he is in danger of falling into the corrupt category. Not on the level of a Tom Delay or anything..." ejeff, Stephanie Parker Weaver said on the air that Frank Melton is giving Stokes money for his ward. Isn't that corruption?

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 18 2006

Ladd, you have been here so well, it breaks my heart, because you could be somewhere else, but you are here. I am listening to Dylan's modern times. I am thinking people need to stand in the light, and you do. my gosh, the city is in so need of good-ness. Not to shine too bright a light on you , but hey . hurray. tough job, really. do your yoga.

sunshine

Sep 18 2006

**Kacy, did you also hear when Parker-Weaver said the reason Kenneth Stokes is so quiet is because Frank Melton is giving him money for his district. Isn't it illegal for a city council member to accept money from the mayor? Isn't that like, buying votes?** <-- blu_n_redstate No, unfortunately I did not. The little I heard was so revolting that I couldn't keep listening.

Kacy

Sep 18 2006

Sure, bnar, but it has to be proven. "...have sensed for the last couple of years from Kenny's tone both on and off camera that he is in danger of falling into the corrupt category. Not on the level of a Tom Delay or anything..." ejeff, Stephanie Parker Weaver said on the air that Frank Melton is giving Stokes money for his ward. Isn't that corruption?

Jeff Lucas

Sep 18 2006

And it also depends on where the money is coming from and what it is being used for. If FM is trying to secure public money or grants for projects or groups in KS' ward that's one thing. But if FM is putting money in KS' pocket (especially public money), that is a horse of a different color.

Jeff Lucas

Sep 18 2006

Not really illegal. Ever heard of patronage? awarding of grants. If withing mayor's discretion it can happen.

Kingfish

Sep 18 2006

I've been thinking more along the lines of a quid pro quo between Melton and Stokes. I can only speculate as to the nature of the exchange, but it must be pretty attractive for Stokes to continue to go to bat for Melton in light of his obvious crimes and the weight of the D.A., the A.G., and possibly the Feds coming down on him. Or it could just be that Stokes is blindly stupid, but I generally give him more credit than that.

Jeff Lucas

Sep 18 2006

Not really illegal. Ever heard of patronage? awarding of grants. If withing mayor's discretion it can happen. Well, doesn't it look fishy if he, Melton, is only putting funds into Stokes' ward? Something has to be illegal about that.

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 18 2006

Donna, I wish that you and Adam were MORE visible. You're already putting those TV TALKING HEADS to shame. But I just wish we could see more of you. Is 'more visible' grammatically correct? :)

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 18 2006

Well, blu, punditry can get in the way of reporting, as is readily apparent everywhere one looks. ;-) We have much more work to do on so many fronts. Y'all keep the citizen journalism coming our way, and we'll do everything we can to continue to make you proud of our corner of the Fourth Estate.

DonnaLadd

Sep 18 2006

Thank God for the Fourth Estate, because without you, we would be in total ignorance of our great city.

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 18 2006

Is 'more visible' grammatically correct? :) No, blu, the correct word is "visibler." You could also say that Donna and Adam should "utilitize visibulation" to get your point across. Hope that helps. ;-)

Todd Stauffer

Sep 18 2006

Well, blu, keep thanking those businesses that distribute the JFP and other free publications—being that The Clarion-Ledger is trying to control us right on out of our distribution spots (or make us pay them for the privilege!). Power to the (free) press! ;-) Seriously, thank you all for helping us fight The Clarion-Ledger's efforts to control the free-distribution market. You're all making a huge difference—and helping ensure that our readers still can get their copies of the JFP every week and read stories by Adam Lynch and Brian Johnson and Natalie Collier and see cartoons by Darren Schwindaman, and, and. Now that publisher John Newhouse has turned up the heat on his TDN oven, we need your help more than ever in our battle against Goliath. Please take what they're doing seriously. They do.

DonnaLadd

Sep 18 2006

No, blu, the correct word is "visibler." You could also say that Donna and Adam should "utilitize visibulation" to get your point across. Gave me quite a chuckle there, todds. A GWB supporter, I assume? ;)

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 18 2006

I know I'm going to get lambasted for this, but I just want to make an observation. I caught the WAPT interview, and I must say, the Donna Ladd commenting on Melton there seemed much different from the ladd posting in this blog. I admire the decision of diplomacy when appearing on main stream media. BTW, when were corners built into the Fourth Estate? I always thought it more globulous.

NoConspiracy

Sep 19 2006

NoConspiracy, keep in mind that Donna's got alot of room here to post her full meaning, in writing. When doing a TV interview, it's *very* easy to be quoted incompletely, or out of context (with or without malicious intent on the part of the TV folks). Saying something in 15 seconds or less requires way more tact than saying something in 15,000 words or less.

kate

Sep 19 2006

Did anyone see Frank Melton going into City Hall and the TV news folks saying that he was flanked by his body guards? I thought that Hodd said that these two indited bodyguards were to be "reassigned" and given a position where they would not need guns. If they are "guarding" Melton and he is harmed, where is the liability? Will tax payers have to suck-it-up when a law suit is filed? Frank also said that he would be back in Washington and Verden Additions to help with the demolition of other houses. He has begun to show Hood that he will do what he darn well please. The kicker will be his staying away from children and the alcohol/drugs. He is allowing Stephanie P-Weaver, Danks and Evers to set the stage for how he should act and what he should do. I wonder if he is really stupid enough or grandiose enough to take that risk? Frank announced that he has 1.6 BILLION dollars worth of projects. If this is true - why are they trying to pass a tax increase? Also, Ben Allen made it crystal clear that these projects started "a long, long, long time ago." He came short of saying that these were projects started by former Mayor Harvey Johnson and that Frank has been in the streets "fighting crime" or better said, fighting for and against criminals just as Danks was working "for and against the City."

justjess

Sep 19 2006

both marcus and recio are sworn jpd officers. even without their guns it seems that their services could be put to better use than handling constituent calls at the mayors office.how about assigning them to hq and helping out in records, for instance?

chimneyville

Sep 19 2006

I agree chimneyville, but they continue to function as body guards for Melton.- not people serving the city for constituent calls. This just does not feel right.

justjess

Sep 19 2006

NoCon, actually it wasn't different at all—although it was way edited down, of course. I've said repeatedly here that this is a tragedy, that he should step down for both himself and for the city, that he is complex and charming ... let's see, what else?

DonnaLadd

Sep 19 2006

Melton fired the city's lobbyists and replaced them with Marcus Ward. He said Ward had experience and connections to continue the $$ coming in to Jackson. Next thing we knew, Ward is Chief of Staff and doing very little lobbying, but has plenty of time to escort the Mayor around and hold an umbrella for him yesterday. Melton made a policeman the spokesperson for the entire city at a time when there's a shortage of policemen. Chief Anderson reassigned bodyguards Wright and Recio to administrative detail. Next thing we see, they're flanking Melton (he must have overruled the Chief). If Melton is so deathly afraid for his life because of the many threats he says he gets, they why is he using unarmed bodyguards? Then we see that Melton has yanked Charles Melvin, a former MBN agent he hired with the city as "office coordinator" (for youth services, ostensibly) to be his new driver. The more I watch Melton jerking staff around, the more wonder if he really was the super CEO at WLBT that everybody says he was, or that he ended up a millionare was just plain luck. BTW, Attorney Bill Kirksey's comments on TV-3 yesterday were priceless: Melton's actions were "...foolish..." and that seemingly, by ignoring the AG's earlier warning, Melton appeared to be "...trying to break into jail..."

Kacy

Sep 19 2006

BTW, is it just me, or does it look like members of Melton's entourage were all wearing matching outfits in the photo on the front of the Ledge right now? It seemed to be a peach kind of day—or was it melon?

DonnaLadd

Sep 19 2006

OMG Ladd! I noticed that too. The orange polos with black t-shirts. Mighty fine looking pair there! All Melton needed was a leather leash and they'd be all the rage! Glad to know our police department has solved so many of Jackson's problems they can reassign these guys to answer the phones and open Melton's mail instead of working desk duty at the police department. That's a great use of our budget incease!

pikersam

Sep 19 2006

I also noticed WLBT saying they broke the story first. When I heard that, I said to myself, no you didn't! Heck, the JFP was the first place I found about the Ridgeway Street house. That wasn't reported on electronic media until maybe a day or two later.

golden eagle

Sep 19 2006

WLBT reported it at 10 p.m. on Sept. 1, hours after Adam reported it here. They were the first TV station to report it—but they in no conceivable way "broke" it. To my knowledge, they have not corrected that, yet, either.

DonnaLadd

Sep 19 2006

Actually here your comments take a much different meaning. Maybe it's the *sum* of the parts that I'm seeing. You criticize Melton's every action (I will admit, almost. There is some credit for a few good things.), you post a link to a praise story that credits the mayor's indictment to JFP's story (which would have happened with or without JFP's involvement), and you're hounding the issue of who got to the story first. This sum says to me "we're singlehandedly responsible for the mayor's demise and you should thank us for it."

NoConspiracy

Sep 19 2006

NoCon, you will note that in the WAPT story, I said that he hasn't done a good job as mayor since Day 1. So if it's consistency you're trolling for, look no further. Otherwise, I call it like I see it. As for the mainstream media, which I suspect you work in, I'm not convinced this story would have happened without us. Maybe. Maybe not. Truth is, the MSM had nearly a week of being tipped off to get it out before we did. That is very disturbing to me. It is also disturbing to me to watch a TV station outright lie and say they broke a story that they didn't. Go study Ethics 101 if you don't get why it's important to challenge them on such a ploy. Your final statement really says a lot about what you're up to. Actually, NoCon, the mayor is singlehandedly responsible for his demise, and we were willing to cover his actions. All of them. From the beginning. Of that, we are very proud. That is our job.

DonnaLadd

Sep 19 2006

You know, the more I watch the folks around Melton, the more I believe the man can not stand to be alone. Wonder when the last time was that he spend even an hour alone in his home? A little facinated that the pro-youth mayor would pull the Youth Supervisor to drive him. Guess the man has a gun permit. Oh, well, are the story writers gathering here yet?

ChrisCavanaugh

Sep 19 2006

Your final statement really says a lot about what you're up to. Actually, NoCon, the mayor is singlehandedly responsible for his demise, and we were willing to cover his actions. All of them. From the beginning. Of that, we are very proud. That is our job. Ladd That is so true; and the biggest fact that the Meltonites reject. They call this a political witchhunt, a set-up or circumventing the will of the voters. Come on, no one but Melton, his bodyguards, and the boys are to blame for the predicament they face. To call this a political hack job is offensive to law persons, the atty's who study law, and the judicial system as we know it. Then this morning you had Ben touting the fact that "we" are going to let due process take place for Melton, just like all citizens are afforded in America. O RLY? What about the due process of Even Welch and the lady who owns the home? Where was their due process and why aren't you fighting for that? It is amazing to see the same people who will pledge allegiance to the flag at a group function, just cast aside the principles that make America great because "their man" tells them it was a crack house and he was going to be unconventional fighting crime. Unconventional is the hands-on approach he takes with the police department. Unconventional is not breaking the law by tearing up a house and terrorizing a club full of young adults. Don't be surprised if the delay in Melton's resignation is for the "money" behind Melton to have time to line up a candidate they can try to push off on the public. Which would show that crime is not the real (wink, wink) reason they were behind Melton.

pikersam

Sep 19 2006

But, that's the job of every media institution - to cover Melton's actions, and anyone else's actions that's important to the people who read or view that institution. And, I followed your link for the "ploy." From what I saw, there was no outright lie. They did break the story on their air to their viewers. And to hammer away at an issue because your feelings got hurt is not a good plan. Go study Business 101 if you don't get why you need to keep your emotions in check and sometimes just move on the next story. While you're at it, try PR 101 for readership outside your circle of friends on this blog. BTW, I have knowledge of Ethics 101 and I think you should focus on the high road. I understand you have issues with the "mainstream media." I do too. But I also have problems with the "free press," because so many of these outlets are looking for the ploy, or the conspiracy instead of searching for only a kernel of truth. When someone keeps something from you, it doesn't always mean there is a plan to cheat the public, it may just mean they don't like your tactics. And certainly, not everyone is your enemy and shouldn't be labeled such when their views run opposite yours. Case in point, I made an observation in contrast to your beliefs and suddenly I must work in the mainstream media. I'm not saying yours is an invalid service, I guess I'm just saying temper it with some rationality, and then you won't have to be disturbed by what other news organizations do.

NoConspiracy

Sep 19 2006

No, NoCon, they were not saying that they were "breaking" it to their viewers. That's a ridiculous statement, and even non-media people know it. If that were the case, every single story they ever did would be "breaking." My feelings aren't hurt. We are getting kudos locally, regionally and nationally. The point is that WLBT did wrong, and should apologize for it. They need to take personal responsibility for their own actions. And that has nothing whatsoever to do with what you personally think of the "free press." You're entitled to your opinion, but what an unnamed poster thinks of the "free press" is of minimal concern and has little to do with the ethics of a major media outlet saying they broke a story when you didn't. That is disturbing, as any dishonest statement is or should be. Let's keep the issues straight here, and I say that with utmost rationality.

DonnaLadd

Sep 19 2006

Ladd, first I want to apologize, and that's not a good thing right now! ha. but truly, what I said above , that you could be somewhere else instead of here, yikes. you know what I meant, I hope. so, to the business at hand - I do not watch TV. I do not get the Ledger. I read JFP. It's all I need to know. I trust it, I love it. amen. well, namaste. ok, you rock. I am so so glad you are here.

sunshine

Sep 19 2006

sunshine, don't worry. I knew exactly what you meant. Sure, I could be somewhere else, as could anybody on our staff and so many folks who are fighting the "worthy scrap" in Jackson. But, you know what? We don't want to be. There is nowhere I would rather live and work. It took me 18 years to realize that, but now y'all are stuck with me, kemosabes (kemosabi?). ;-)

DonnaLadd

Sep 19 2006

I could totally be chilling in the mountians of NC! Any word from the Council meeting? Did SP Weaver start a riot?

pikersam

Sep 19 2006

According to the Clarion Liar, there were about 150 Meltonites there, baa'ing sheeplike for their Flock Leader.

Ironghost

Sep 19 2006

It appears that Melton got his base out tonight at City Hall. The Ledge is reporting that about 150 people showed up chanting and singing. The Meltonites must be reaching: “Vote Frank Melton not guilty,” shouted Clarence Bolls. Bolls said Melton is the only public official bringing attention to the problems of drugs and crime in Jackson. “We have been begging for help in Virden Addition for 53 years that I know of,” he said. Bolls is co-owner of Gloria's Kitchen, an eatery located less than a mile away from where the mayor and his two police bodyguards are alleged to have used sledgehammers to severely damage a duplex they claimed was a drug haven. Now those that listen to Ben and Larry or just Larry or just Ben will know of Gloria's Kitchen. Gloria is a bitter angry woman (at least on the radio - can't judge beyond that) who claimed that Harvey Johnson supporters threw eggs at her diner and tried to shut her down during a rant with Larry, and the "other" Alan, on the infamous "sledgehammer give-away" show a couple of weeks ago. O RLY?!? That is just a sampling of her vile spew towards those who aren't fond of Frank. They are welcome to send the tape over to the JFP of that show; but, those who listen to the shows will relate. Anywho, she calls in all the time trashing Harvey, Frank bashers, and to pump up Frank. All together now with Gloria...."Pride Ride, Pride Ride, Pride Ride!"

pikersam

Sep 19 2006

Reminds me of the night they stood outside the community room in the Medical Mall and tried to shout down the JAN forum going on inside after Melton stormed out after refusing to sit next to a convicted felon. Johnson and Annell Smith just kept talking calmly through the fracas until it died down. Sigh. I do wonder what they think City Council can do to help Melton now. Maybe they're working on the jury nullification plan discussed on Tisdale's show Friday night. Sigh.

DonnaLadd

Sep 19 2006

So what we need here is 300 anti-dictator frank protestors to show up at the next meeting and hoop and hollerrrrrrr to let them know not everyone thinks his royal assness is welcomed anymore.

Jo-D

Sep 19 2006

It;a amazing how people are willing to follow a loser like Melton. From day one he has conned the public into believing that he loves Jackson. If he truly loved the city, then resign and let the healing process begin. Since he has been off of the scene, crime has slowed down. Kinda makes you wonder what he really was doing out there on those nightly raids. The same idiots that follow Melton want to skip past the truth that you CANNOT destroy a house without proper paperwork in place. Stokes (with his dumb a$$) says that the wheels of justice are moving too slow, but he will quickly hide behind the law when it protects him. The truth is blind to any special interest group. Melton broke the law, plain and simple. If he is not punished then we will have all sorts of crime taking place because the criminals will know that they have a free pass. The Ag and the DA would no longer be effective if they do not prosecute. They gave Melton all of the chances in the world to clean up his act and he thumbed his nose at them. Anyone who supports giving Melton another chance is supporting lawlessness in it's purest form.

lance

Sep 19 2006

“We have been begging for help in Virden Addition for 53 years that I know of,” he said. - C-L My mom spent her childhood and adolescent years in Virden Addition, and she told us all the time that drugs and crime were not a problem back then. This was in the 50's and 60's, so unless she didn't know what was going on, 53 years doesn't sound accurate. Maybe this was a misquote.

LatashaWillis

Sep 19 2006

According to the Clarion Liar, there were about 150 Meltonites there, baa'ing sheeplike for their Flock Leader. Remember that Melton is a local celebrity. He had his "Bottom Line" segment on TV for many years, and he has spoken at schools, churches, etc. Then there's the YMCA thing, too. A lot of citizens are enamored with him the same way someone may be a fan of Judge Judy, Louis Farrakhan, Howard Stern, etc. - those who feel powerless and believe they do not have a voice gravitate toward someone who they think will say what's on their mind and have the power to act on their behalf. I'm sure a lot of these supporters grew up listening to Melton and seeing him on TV, and admired him as a result. I remember him visiting my school and my church when I was a teen, and I thought he was cool because he said he helped kids and he had bodyguards like he was the President. I believe that if I did not learn more about how the law really works and what civil liberties are really about, I would probably be thinking that Melton didn't do anything wrong either. This situation is so dangerous that it's scary. Do you support someone who broke the law just because he/she is in the same ethnic group or you happen to like him/her a lot? If so, how would you feel if this person did such a thing to you? Would you just let it go? There is a coup d'etat in Thailand right now. I can imagine how uneasy the citizens are right now. If we don't get some unity in this city, I fear that the atmosphere will change for the worse. If people in Jackson have already been shot over a boyfriend, a card game or a sandwich, you KNOW someone could get shot because of an argument about Melton. If the mayor thought he needed the National Guard before, he will definitely need them soon if this situation is not resolved soon. Based on what I saw on the news about what happened at City Hall this evening, I'm not sure what to expect at this point. I could be overrreacting, but I feel like there could be anarchy if there is a trial and Melton is convicted - kinda like the flipside of the Rodney King fiasco.

LatashaWillis

Sep 19 2006

Oh yeah, about Thailand: http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/09/19/thailand.coup.rumor/index.html Also, Hungary is having issues too: BUDAPEST, Hungary (CNN) -- Hungary's prime minister has refused to resign after anti-government riots and vowed to stay in office, even as thousands of flag-waving protesters converged on government buildings Tuesday in increasingly violent demonstrations. "I am not ready to resign," Ferenc Gyurcsany said, adding that audiotaped statements in which he admitted his government had lied about Hungary's economy were taken out of context. Gyurcsany insisted Tuesday that his remarks referred to the past 10 or 15 years, and not just the time in which his administration has held Hungary's reins. The crowd set a car on fire. A lot more was set on fire in South Central L.A. I hope law enforcement is on high alert here.

LatashaWillis

Sep 19 2006

Here's more from today's article with quote qoodness from the ever slimy, Hickingbottom: It was not clear who organized the pro-Melton campaign, but several of his key staff members were handing out professionally printed signs and stickers that read "Fight Frank Fight" and "I Support Frank." One of those was Bob Hickingbottom, a self-styled consultant for Melton who was handing out a petition calling for Hood to investigate Peterson on a variety of charges, ranging from official misconduct to questions about the investigation of Melton, which the petition describes as "a personal vendetta and/or politically motivated." Hickingbottom would not comment on the petition but was seen earlier Tuesday with a memo titled "Talking Points in defense of Mayor Melton." The memo instructed people to highlight successes in Melton's year-plus in office, such as beginning restoration of the King Edward Hotel. The memo instructs defenders to predict the mayor will beat the charges resulting from a "partisan, personal investigation" and that Melton will fight "with every legal tool." City spokesman Tyrone Lewis said he was dimly aware of the petition. "I heard about it. I don't know a whole lot about it," he said. "A lot of stuff that is circulating now I haven't been privy to." Records show Hickingbottom was a paid staffer for the Melton campaign, earning more than $7,400 over six months in 2005. When asked what he did for the campaign, Hickingbottom shrugged, saying, "Spin doctor, mostly." Lewis said Hickingbottom is employed by the city through a temporary agency as a "quality control inspector" for the public works department. "His job description calls for him to inspect ... work sites and maintenance inspections for the public works division," Professionally made signs. Talking points. Oh yeah, the AG is going to have a field day in court! Danks denied the public campaign is part of a broader legal strategy. He said he had seen the petition, an unsigned copy of which was anonymously faxed to his office Monday and that he was "very much concerned" about it. "I know people mean well, particularly his supporters," Danks said. "This is a criminal charge situation. Even people who mean well can do harm. ... We've got to keep it within the confines of the legal system now and not do anything to jeopardize that." Let'em keep talking Faye. It will just make the fall all that much further and harder when he hits rock bottom!

pikersam

Sep 20 2006

Sounds like Danks doesn't know what Melton's up to.

Ironghost

Sep 20 2006

The memo instructed people to highlight successes in Melton's year-plus in office, such as beginning restoration of the King Edward Hotel. Something that was getting started before Frank got into office. OK, I'll give him partial credit for pushing it to the point to get it started, but he can't take all the credit. But of course, Hickingbottom would have some "talking points memo". As I've eluded to in a prior post, how else would Melton supporters know what positive things he's actually done while in office?

golden eagle

Sep 20 2006

This letter writer sums up what I've just said: "What has he done that is positive?"

golden eagle

Sep 20 2006

Question? how do you then account for the obvious support that Melton still gets in the community. Over 150 supporters at the council meeting which did not disentegrate into a riot (as some thought). the constant leters to the editor in support of Melton and the fact that in every poll taken by every TV station by phone and online has the majority of people saying that no, Melton shouldnt go to jail , and yes they support him? WAPT's latest poll (last night) has those who dont think he should go to jail besting those who do. Overwhelmingly folks are saying that they feel the indictments are poltically motivated because they came down too fast. Story on the news last night, had two buisness owners whose shop was burglarized and the culprits STILL have not come to trial in a year yet the DA comes through this fast on this issue? just posing an alternate thought. You guys feel as if your opinions are right but it looks as if a majority of the city sides with Melton. but of course as you've answered before you will say they are wrong because they disagree with you. From what I saw, intelligent, respected members of the community are supporing him. Its not just ignorant poor folks with no understanding of the law. that fact you cant dispute. You guys may be the ones wrong on this, ever considered that? You have mothers, fathers, lawmakers(Anderson) and others willing to stand by this man.If he was so bad I think more folks would be out for his head. IMO

goldeneye

Sep 20 2006

For anyone fretting about the show of support at city council last night, please don't worrry. They're only causing the state to become angrier and mightier. I heard this morning that Melton and Danks called a meeting with Slim and None. Slim showed up anxious but None walked through the door cursing and muttering "this is some bullshit." After a few moment of drinks and chatter, Melton asked None (who refused to partake) if he could get him out of this one. An offended None retorted "hell, I heard it was 7 or 8 altogether, so what the ____ do you mean by this one. I mastered arithematic while in school." At this point Danks recognized None was growing even more angrier at Melton and took over. Danks then turned off the lights and started showing Slim and None a powerepoint production of how he thought they could prevail if Slim and None stayed around to help out. When the lights were cut back on None was no where to be seen. Slim later reported that none grabbed his keys and left as soon as the lights were turned out, whispering to Slim he wasn't about to risk his life and respected legacy fooling around with this sh1t. Hang in there, folks. A new mayor is on the way!

Ray Carter

Sep 20 2006

goldeneye, I think people are *wrong* to support Melton because I think that it is clear that he has repeatedly, willfully, and violently *broken the law*.

kate

Sep 20 2006

And, goldeneye, because Melton is the Mayor, and therefore the leader of this city, yes, he gets special treatment when he breaks the law. When the chief executive of the city is terrorizing its citizenry, then that calls for special measures.

kate

Sep 20 2006

And another, thing. I don't care if 99% of the city thinks that Melton's behavior is acceptable. I'm not going to change my ethics because there was protest in his favor.

kate

Sep 20 2006

Ray, do you mean that FM's chances of getting out of this mess are Slim and None?

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 20 2006

Blu, None has left town. The only reason Slim is still here is because he's desperately trying to compete with None's great legacy of success. He takes the leftovers. I hear Frank was in Houston yesterday looking for defense lawyers. I can't wait to see if he hired Dick Deguerin, Racehorse Haynes or the likes. If he does he will be a lot broker afterward. Cullen Davis reportedly paid Racehorse $10, 000,000.00., and he got off for killing or participating in the killing of his wife. I doubt Frank is that rich. Dick charges less but still a lot.

Ray Carter

Sep 20 2006

Melton campaigned about tearing dow the King Edwards. He said it in his acceptance speech and spent the last 12 months threatening to "blow it up." He even tried to get Duce McAllister to "Keep his money in your pocket." After finding out that some key Whites were behind restoration of the King Edwards and that it is a historical landmark, melton got quiet. Melton couldn't "lick 'em so he joined them." So how does he take any credit for the King Edwards? On "Straight Talk" with Bluntson and Stephanie P-Weaver last week, Stephanie blamed this on former Mayor Harvey Johnson and his supporters. This is very troubling and is a strategy that they are using to make sure that the next person in office will be one that can be controlled by Melton and it will be business as usual. Johnson has been out of that war with Stephanie, Frank, Bluntson and Stokes. I'm sure that he (Johnson) will not stoop to that level of vindictiveness and evil - those forces that drive this group. These people know exactly what they are doing and they are depending on the poor, the ignorant and the racist to keep their mission alive. The investigation by the FBI has not been completed. What do they plan to do if even more charges are made against Melton? It's time for him and them to GO!

justjess

Sep 20 2006

So what we need here is 300 anti-dictator frank protestors to show up at the next meeting and hoop and hollerrrrrrr to let them know not everyone thinks his royal assness is welcomed anymore. Jo-D, Who is going to run the JFP if all of its employees are at the next meeting?

colby

Sep 20 2006

Dan Modisett, vice president and general manager of WLBT3, was on his channel last night (in a commentary) summing up his thoughts of FM's indictments. It appears to me that Modisett thinks Melton should be given a get-out-of-jail free card just like all the other criminals (who in his words) are allowed to walk free all the time. He also attacked those who enforce the law--not the lawbreaker. Read his commentary below: http://www.wlbt.com/Global/story.asp?S=5431617 Jackson 09/19/06 Sound Off: Jackson Mayor Frank Melton For the past twenty years Frank Melton has been a larger than life figure in Jackson. His work with disadvantaged and troubled youth is well documented. He has contributed much of his time and money to help those who have been forgotten. His weekly "Bottom Line" editorials were powerful indictments on the broken criminal and judicial system in Hinds County and the City of Jackson. When Frank was overwhelmingly elected Mayor of Jackson there was a sense of euphoria that he could single handily fix the criminal and judicial system that he had long attacked. I heard more than once that it was about time that the good guys start winning the war on crime. There was so much frustration about crime that we didn't care if Frank broke the rules or not, after all the drug dealers, thieves and murderers didn't play by any rules. Every time Frank broke the rules we cheered him on all the more. The theory was in the war on crime the ends justify the means. The trouble with that approach is who determines when it is OK to break the rules. Frank's motives seemed to be good, but some of his methods crossed the line. Wouldn't it be sad if Frank goes to jail when he never stole any money, sold drugs or committed murder, when we see criminal after criminal arrested 10, 20 or 30 times without serving any jail time. This past week we have seen the Attorney General, Sheriff, and even the District Attorney working together to get the fastest indictment in history, it's amazing how well the system works when politics are involved and Frank you can take credit for that. Now we know that it is not the system that is broken, but actually the people who are in charge of the system. On a personal note: Frank, as a friend, I am concerned about your health, your family and how all this will finally end. I just want you to know that there are a lot of people who care about you and are praying for you.

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 20 2006

Now I'm hearing Melton and Danks are worrying about Slim. I'm told Slim is looking real worried and hasn't put the bottle down since he's been with Melton and Danks. Maybe None will sneak back in town and drag a drunkened and emasculated Slim to safety.

Ray Carter

Sep 20 2006

Ray, Cullen Davis is also supposedly, a "Born-Again-Christian". Maybe, that's why Frank went (for the first time) to church services last Sunday. Remember the last church he went to he had a gun on him, which helped to contribute to one of his indictments. Who knows? Maybe he gave ole' Cullen a call.

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 20 2006

point is...if a majority of the people want him to stay...he should. bottom line. call a special election...something. but it looks everday like my point is proven. what im saying is something has to be said for the support. it is arrogant for us to sit back and say those folks are wrong or ignorant for following him. the only thing you have to stand on is "he broke the law" and THAT hasnt even been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. Let the people decide, not a few who do not like Melton. because now it appears you guys are in the minority. I wish there could be some definitive poll that would shut some of these people up. Sure you're entitled to your opinion and obviously that wont change..but just mull over the possiblity of all of you being "wrong"

goldeneye

Sep 20 2006

Ray, who is Slim?

chimneyville

Sep 20 2006

Goldeneye, I have this to say: do you think the mayor ought to be able to break the law? We're talking felony counts here, not a misdemeanor like failing to pay a parking ticket. You say that he's "doing something" and I sense many people feel that Jackson city administration has ignored or failed to help communities that are plagued by drug crime. But 1) did Frank really change anything by sledgehammering that house? and 2) Do you support the right of a mayor to commit felonies in the course of his or her job?

Izzy

Sep 20 2006

...and colby Id be really surprised if you can get 50 there let alone 300. they will be outnumbered either way everytime. and thats not coming from me...thats the polls and the show of support at that council meeting. this time next year, Melton may still be office.

goldeneye

Sep 20 2006

It's dazzling that a media person would buy into this spin: This past week we have seen the Attorney General, Sheriff, and even the District Attorney working together to get the fastest indictment in history, it's amazing how well the system works when politics are involved and Frank you can take credit for that. According to witnesses, Mr. Melton led a violent home invasion. He got kids to do criminal stuff, and he pulled police officers into it. Does Mr. Modisett truly not get the severity of this? Remarkable.

DonnaLadd

Sep 20 2006

Chimneyville, Slim and None are a couple of fictitious entities who supposely can help people in dire straits. For instance, if you asked me what was Melton chance of getting out of all this, I'd say Slim and None. If None has left town, and Slim is emasculated, emaciated, and drunk or "smelling the bottle as my grandmother would call it", Melton's chances of getting convicted are now excellent and assured. Remember chimneyville, in case you haven't noticed, I try to tell stories with humor.

Ray Carter

Sep 20 2006

Laurel, those are trumped up charges. for one the "law" as you all so eloquently say, has always been used and abused by this country for years. America has made it known to black folks that these "laws" are open to interpretation and "can be changed or manipulated by the government" to fit their devices. thats why i have a total disregard for it. they use it when it fits them and discard it when it doesnt. Black people in those communities have been abused by "the law" for decades they have no respect for it either. Everytime a woman calls 911 because her husband is beating or stalking her and the police said they need a "reason" to arrest him i have no respect for it. there are numerous people in jail falsely because of the law. wives and girlfireinds are dead waiting for the "law" to work. and crack houses still stand because of the "law" so dont give me that. the guy in the house had 32 charges on him. the house had been visited by law enforcement over 30 times. People in that vey neighborhood said crack was either being sold or used in that house. but they won't anymore. why because those same "laws" that you champion allowed that fella to get arrested, get out, and continue doing what he was doing all the while using the "law" to get him sent to whitfield because he had a mental illness. but not too mentally ill to know what crack was apparently.

goldeneye

Sep 20 2006

goldeneye, we (none supporters of FM) are not in the minority. Those polls or just like the media (not JFP) very lopsided. We know who is controlling those numbers. The only office FM is going to be in this time next year is either his personal office at his house or the Warden's office! There would/could be way more than 50 people out to march against FM. What we want to do is beat him in the court system not the courtyard!

maad

Sep 20 2006

Goldeneye, you do realize that those "polls" you speak of are unscientific, do you? A three-year old playing on his or her parents' computer can vote in those polls. There's no way to get a sample representation on how people in Jackson really feel about Frank. Also, people are jumping down Faye Peterson for going after Frank so fast, but not other criminals. The last I look, she can't don a police uniform and arrest criminals. She can only prosecute cases once they are brought forward to her.

golden eagle

Sep 20 2006

goldeneye, If those same polls say it's OK to start lynching people that are suspected of dealing drugs, would that be alright? No jury.No trial.Just a rope. By any means necessary right?

Cliff Cargill

Sep 20 2006

Thanks Mad. Goldeneye, Frank finally gone into a saloon and jumped on somebody one time too many. He was duly warned and pardoned before, but nothing short of an asswupping is enough for Frank. Now, he has made the big league and is going to find out like Gotti, the James boys, Capone, Pretty Boy Floyd, Dillinger and many others that - the guvment can make some swift and defining justice just for him.

Ray Carter

Sep 20 2006

And she is great at doing that isn's she golden eagle?

colby

Sep 20 2006

Yes Colby, because it's the JFP who is causing Melton all this trouble, not a) outraged citizens, and b) Melton himself. Agreed, justjess. It is a joke for Melton to claim the King Edward as a success when it was his bumbling that nearly derailed the project more than once this year. See the umpteen stories Adam has written on this issue. By the way, L.W., I found the celebrities you chose as compatriots of Melton illuminating: Louis Farakhan, Judge Judy and Howard Stern. Maybe he's a mix of all three? ;) Donna, it's actually que no sabe, though they always pronounced it wrong on Lone Ranger. One of the weird things about that show. Tonto means "stupid." Que no sabe means "know nothing." You know, like Colby.

Brian C Johnson

Sep 20 2006

Let me also say, Frank's actions placed him on the top of the list for a speedy indictment and trial. Any criminal driving a big-ass rv on a nightly basis, telling the guvment to kiss his ass, then proceeding onward to publicly commit crime after crime, would automatically and rightly so warrant the most attention and detail to his case. Frank is no victim of anything unjust. It's time for Frank to pay the criminal justice system that he so visibly abused.

Ray Carter

Sep 20 2006

Does anyone remember when this all started with the DA, Faye Peterson and the Melton s$$$.? How soon we forget! She met with the AG and sent documents supporting the issues she was dealing with as it relates to witnesses tampering. Jim Hood sat on this for months. Now it is being said that Faye Peterson went for Frank's jugular-quick, fast and in a hurry. It didn't happen that way: Frank drove his own butt over this cliff and isn't it interesting that he is not sheparded by his family? He walked in Church with his lawyer - not his WIFE. Even when Jeffery Dalmer was arrested, he had his biological father and step-mother by his side. The are things that make you go huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!I committ murder

justjess

Sep 20 2006

Goldeneye, do you have any evidence that the house was visited over 30 times? The reason why Welch has never been held for long is that most of his arrests are for petty crime. Or how long do you think they hold someone for shoplifting, which are several of his arrests? What a criminal mastermind! I imagine that crime in Virden has dropped dramatically now that they have Lex Luther off the streets. Oh wait, he's actually on the streets, because once again, he was arrested for petty offenses. If Welch was a drug lord, why didn't they charge him with something more than paraphanelia? I guess he must have snuck out the vast cache of drugs he had, just like Hussein smuggled those WMDs to Syria, eh?

Brian C Johnson

Sep 20 2006

Goldeneye, try this: Go to http://www.wlbt.com/Global/category.asp?C=7855&nav=menu119_2 Scroll down to WLBT Online Poll: Do you think Jackson Mayor Frank Melton will be convicted on felony charges? Cast your vote. Later on today, go to the same link and cast your vote again—or better yet, go to a friend's computer and vote there. When you get home today, turn on your computer, and vote again in the SAME online poll. Go to your family members' home and vote on their computer. Bring them to your house, and let them vote, vote, vote, vote! And tomorrow, after casting another vote, go to JFP and let us all know how SCIENTIFIC those online polls are—okay?

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 20 2006

Also, it is important to note that Sheriff McMillin says they have nowhere to put someone like Welch—who is severely mentally ill and can't afford treatment. They don't have space downtown to hold someone like that for petty crimes, and they won't keep them on the penal farm if they are in no condition to work, he said Friday when someone asked him why deputies came to re-arrest Welch the day after he was released last week: That was a mistake. There are no warrants (for Welch). He was a free man. No one is looking for him. … Somebody got the paperwork mixed up. Instead of it being in this pile, it was in another pile. Consequently, he was released, and it wasn't until after then we found he was released because he was ill, and we had no space for him at the jail, while we would have at the penal farm, but we don't keep people at the penal farm that can't work.” Face it. All the spin in the world out of the Melton camp cannot turn this guy into a major drug kingpin. There is just no evidence. They have never found crack in the house that we can find. It's not a crackhouse if there is no crack in it. If they believed it was, the strategy was to send in narcotics officers to do it legally. Not to turn children and police officers into criminals and thugs. If the charges against Melton are true, there is simply no way to justify them. The fact that Evans Welch is a mentally ill petty drug user just makes it look worse, but he would be subject to the same charges if the man were actually a kingpin. This is America, and we don't allow people in authority to go on rampages without evidence. We. just. don't.

DonnaLadd

Sep 20 2006

There is a reason the JFP has never done online polls.

DonnaLadd

Sep 20 2006

blu_n_a_redstate, you summoned the polling up in a nutshell !!!

maad

Sep 20 2006

...and guess what Brian, Mr. Welch is a paranoid schizophrenic. The signs and symptoms that he displays are all consistent with this diagnosis - just as Melton's signs and symptoms are consistent with his -criminality. Just for the record: The MBN reported on WAPT (16) last night that they had only been to Mr. Welch's home one, (1,) uno, I, time. This is a far cry from Melton's claim that the MBN had been to the house 30 time.

justjess

Sep 20 2006

It's also a good place to remind folks that during the time Christopher Walker, a felon on probation, was staying in his home this year, he failed either 11 or 12 drug tests. And the minor Mr. Melton is accused in the indictments of getting to commit a felony, Michael Taylor, was living with Mr. Melton when he was wanted for a felony. When deputies tried to arrest him, Melton ran from the deputies with Taylor in his SUV. The sheriff had to call Melton to get him to hand him over. Then the same young man has been part of the lawn crew, riding along with Mr. Melton on the Mobile Command Center and, witnesses say, committing crimes at Mr. Melton's instruction. But one would try to argue that, somehow, Mr. Welch is the greater threat to Jackson's society?

DonnaLadd

Sep 20 2006

Another point. Although Melton has not been convicted, he has not denied the allegations against him either. In fact, Danks all but acknolwedged that they were true by arguing that the mayor showed poor judgment. The strategy here seems to be jury nullification. So it's not that Melton is innocent of the charges. It's that they should be set aside because of his "intent." Because the charges are "politically motivated." Personally, I would want a more robust defense if I was facing six felony charges. Trashing the DA and the AG is not going to get Melton out of this mess. Regarding jury nullification, AG Hood addressed this question at his press conference on Friday. He said that the prosecutor, whoever that is, will ask potential jurors about their views on this. A good prosecutor, he said, can tell if a juror has an agenda. Jurors are supposed to hear cases on their merits. Melton's "intent" might have some bearing on the penalty phase, but I can't see how it allows him to enter a credible plea of "not guilty." By the way, the standard for conviction is "beyond a reasonable doubt," not "beyond a shadow of a doubt." Finally, we live in a constitutional republic, not a democracy. Ultimately, it doesn't matter how much support Melton has in the community--it matters politically, but not legally. This is not Athens, where citizens just sort of made up their minds whether to convict. There is good reason for this--Athenian jurors sentenced Socrates to death for "corrupting" the youth. We usually call this "teaching," but without laws to restrain the majority, that's the kind of "justice" you get. For better and worse, the Founders mistrusted the passions of the people. The task before the criminal justice system is not: "Is Melton a good person? Is his heart in the right place?" The question is: "Did Melton break the law?" That's it. But to be honest, I am skeptical of any claim that there is a groundswell of support for Melton. How many of the voters in these unscientific polls live in the suburbs? Last night's demonstration at City Hall was clearly an orchestrated event--a city employee (Hickingbottom) had plenty of campaign-style stickers handy, now didn't he? My guess is that support for Melton will continue to erode, especially if he faces more charges. If he were to run in an election right now--and he seems to have mistaken his situation for just that--I believe he would be defeated. Badly. But I guess we'll see how deep his support really runs.

Brian C Johnson

Sep 20 2006

If an informant had provided evidence that the house was a drug house why didn't chief Melton go to a judge like Priester and get an affidavit for a warrant to search the house. Priester would have done it with very little evidence if some credible evidence existed that the house contained drugs or other criminality. But we know neither an informant nor other reliable person had provided any evidence of probable cause to beleive the house contained drugs. We also know there weren't any exigent or emegency reasons (i.e Melton and entourage having seen someone carry drugs into the house or using drugs in the house) to crash that house either. This is a case of mayor/police chief gone wild.

Ray Carter

Sep 20 2006

I agree on your last paragraph, Brian. We're hearing from all segments of the community—and they are tired of Mr. Melton's games. Doesn't mean they're the loudest ones and on Stephanie Parker-Weaver's speed-dial, but the thought that most people out there are too stupid to understand that you don't fight crime with crime is insulting, and people know it. People also underestimate the grass-roots support that Faye Peterson has. Doing the right thing is what will matter the most in the long run, long past the antics of the Melton folks. I simply will never forget the night of the JAN forum and what they pulled. It was that night that I really knew what we were dealing with. The word "brats" is the kindest one I can come up with.

DonnaLadd

Sep 20 2006

Melton will have to enter aplea of not guilty at the arraignment regardless because of systematic rules but it likely won't be a credible one. Danks will probably do it for him. Frank doesn't have to be there unless he wants to. With all the publicity about this case, voir dire (jury selection) will be critical and possibly the most important part of the trial. I would probably hire a jury consultant (expert in jury selection) and request from the judge an order using jury questionnaires so as to ask each juror tens of written questions before the trial or actual in court voir dire even begins. However, I would have the judge to summons all jurors to courthouse to answer the questionnaires in order to preclude them getting help from others or having a lot of time to calculate false or misleading answers. I would also ask for jurors just for this case - special vinire. There will likely be lots of bias jurors trying to get on for the purpose of helping both sides.

Ray Carter

Sep 20 2006

Ray, Do you think Melton's attorneys will request a change of venue? Do you think such a request should be made?

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 20 2006

Nall, they won't make a change of venue motion. They won't find a place fairer to them than here. If they mess around and move the case they might really get some justice or a fair trial. They don't want justice or a fair trial, they want forgiveness. Frankly neither side likely wants a fair trial. Both sides usually want to win. Melton wants to win to saty out of jail. Peterson and hood want to win to do justice or save face and careers, depending on what either would admit. I'm on their side though on this one. You request a change of venue, when because of publicity that's likely adverse to you, you can't get a fair trial in that jurisdiction. It's likely the state who might have a problem here getting a fair trial. To my knowledge, the state can't ask for a change of venue. It's only a right given to the defendant. However, if it starts looking clearly that Melton doesn't have as much support as the unscientific polls are showing, or there is a swift and sizable fall off in support, it might be in Melton's best interest to ask for a change of venue. They will be watching this closely.

Ray Carter

Sep 20 2006

goldeneye, what will it take for you to believe that he broke the law? For starters, there are photos showing him wearing a gun in St. Andrew's Cathedral, *after* he had been warned by AG Hood to follow our gun laws, which include NOT wearing guns into churches. Would you feel comfortable granting, for example, Haley Barbour, the right to knock down houses whenever he wants? When the government decides that it can recognize criminals on sight, destroy their property, and lock them up with no charges and no trial, then we end up with things like the Holocaust. I mean, substitute "Jew" or "Black" for "Drug Dealer" or "Thug" in the rhetoric that's being spewed by members of our gov't, and you will start to get very very scared.

kate

Sep 20 2006

The online polls cannot be trusted. There is support for Melton beyond Eastover, in the inner city black community where many are frustrated by the lack of progress in getting drugs out of once safe neighborhoods. There is also as much anger out there in the inner city that he appears to be "fasttracked" thru the legal system by Peterson and Hood as there is anger at Melton's stormtrooper antics. However, their support of Melton does not trump the "rule of law", which *should* apply equally to all of us, officeholders or not. I predicted months ago that there would be a backlash by those who would want to paint this as a witchhunt by the white media and white politicians and their black puppets who appear to want to keep the inner city depressed and drug-infested. SPW and Hickingbottom are playing to this twisted mentality, and whether we like it or not there are those who are going to fall for it and will attack those who want to see justice served. The right thing to do isn't always the most popular thing to do, and sometimes there is a silent majority that knows what the right thing to do is, they are just letting the loudest voices in the room run the media show.

Jeff Lucas

Sep 20 2006

If Frank is fighting crime...somebody needs to pull crime off him before Frank is beaten to death. I'm bothered and hurt by all the talk in favor of Frank and no substance to ga along with it. Where are the facts that he has done a single thing well as mayor or police chief. We still don't have a crime plan and crime has gone up sky high.

Ray Carter

Sep 20 2006

Not sure if it is known or has been posted yet, but there is a feature on NPR's "All Things Considered" today on Frank. I believe that it will air at 4 our time on 91.3FM.

bobnoxious

Sep 20 2006

guess you guys will just have to wait and see...it appears Melton's supporters are real but you guys refuse to acknowledge it...wish there was a way to prove that point. Polls arent credible. the supporters at the mtg arent credible. then what is? IMO Melton would win an election today if it took place and you are underestimating his supporters. Since all his "support" is staged. again you guys are so right about this EVERYONE else has to be wrong. I refer you all back to my last post. you guys probably said the four cops that beat Rodney King were innnocent because the "law" said so huh? BTW..seems as if some of you folks are a litle naive. Havent grown up in a crack infested neighborhood. havent lived next to a crack house or had crack dealers as relatives. your ignorance shows with your "law" talk. Dealers that sell or use crack out of a dwelling DON'T KEEP THE CRACK IN THE HOUSE! DUH. For that very reason..law enforcement may break your door down. one can easily avoid serious charges if nothing but "paraphanelia" is found in the house, a big difference in charges duh. A house where they regularly gather to smoke crack you still wont find anything but a few pipes and a terrible stench. Bust in any crack house in jackson and you won't find any crack geniuses cuz the dealers are a little smarter than that. and also, they love having the convenience of waiting for you to get a warrant. most times they knw yoou coming duh..but you guys are smart I'm sue you knew that. "Couldnt have been a crack house because they didnt find any crack" LOL. get a clue. the dealers wold love you guys because if it was up to ya'll we'd never catch one.

goldeneye

Sep 20 2006

goldeneye, you're arguing with the wall. Of course, he has "real" supporters; so did Ross Barnett and Bull Connor. But that doesn't mean that their actions were right or legal. Do you truly not give a damn about a mayor that witnesses say engaged in criminal activity and took down kids and cops with him? How else can we say it: They. Didn't. Find. Crack. In. The. House. Are you completely dense here? In order for a "house" to be a "crackhouse," it needs "crack" inside. And if there were crack inside it, then we needed a police chief with enough damn sense and courage to send in narcotics officers and find it. It is really incredibly stupid -- not to mention trolling and against the user agreement -- to take the opinions of people who do not believe a mayor should destroy houses without evidence and turn it into those people being in love with crackhouses. All obvious morons are leaving this site now.

DonnaLadd

Sep 20 2006

NPR's "All Things Considered" is on right now. The announcer teased a story on Frank at the top of the hour. It sounds like they interviewed him for the piece. I'm listening right now.

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 20 2006

Goldeneye, you should be glad Frank didn't obtain your services, too, like he did Taylor. You would be brought upon charges with him. Frank is supposed to uphold the law. The local, county, state, and federal legislators and courts know what's better for the people and country than you do. I wonder why they haven't just thrown away the laws for folks like Frank and you. Lots of people in my family have abused alcohol and drugs. No one is anymore against drugs and alcohol as I am. I feel your pain. I want drugs gone too. If government officials won't respect and follow the law, neither will anyone else. We don't need chaos or WILDING, and we don't need Frank. What is Frank's crime plan?

Ray Carter

Sep 20 2006

NPR's "All Things Considered" I am sure Frank will lie himself into a box on this show. It will be easy for the AG to subpoena the transcript and trap him with it. It appears impossible for FM to tell the truth.

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 20 2006

I'm listening also. I doubt that FM will have an interview simply because everything he says can and would be used against him in court. Its probably a summation of events in Jackson since his inauguration up to his indictment.

Jeff Lucas

Sep 20 2006

And if there were crack inside it, then we needed a police chief with enough damn sense and courage to send in narcotics officers and find it. It pains me to say because FM is maniacal at the very least but I almost have to concur. Donna they wouldnt have found any. Sad but true. They rarely do. When they leave, it returns. smh

trusip

Sep 20 2006

"Danks denied the public campaign is part of a broader legal strategy. He said he had seen the petition, an unsigned copy of which was anonymously faxed to his office Monday and that he was "very much concerned" about it." So what if the fax is unsigned, there should be a traceable telephone number at the top, IMHO. Lets get real, someone is planning all of this and I, for one, do not believe you can overcome these indictments with public opinion. So, must be that j-word nullification they are going for. Hmmmmmmm.

ChrisCavanaugh

Sep 20 2006

ejeff wrote, "I doubt that FM will have an interview simply because everything he says can and would be used against him in court." That hasn't stopped himin the past. Do you recall when he was asked (by one of the local TV reporters) if he had carried a gun on a plane? Frank said, "I didn't carry a gun on the plane, I carried two guns..." I think that arrogant answer will eventually come back and bite him in the backside.

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 20 2006

Who knew Orley Hood didn't care about the poor, rental home owners, or due process? What a NJam'er! Quote: Q: Should Frank go to jail? A: Of course not. If doing stupid things were a crime, President Bush (see Iraq) and President Clinton (see Monica) would be cleaning urinals in Leavenworth. As for that house in question, it looked as if gravity was going to bring it down sooner rather than later. Next time, Frank needs to ask if he can knock down a house. Or at least count to 10 and pray for a strong breeze. It's the polite thing to do. I guess all those years of easy writing can make one a jaded closeminded person.

pikersam

Sep 20 2006

Yes, bnared, but all of that was before the indictments and the muzzle that Danks has wisely placed on him. So far he appears to be staying in line, saying very little publicly and giving no interviews that I've heard. But who knows, that could change tomorrow.

Jeff Lucas

Sep 20 2006

You were right, ejeff. There was no interview with Frank--just a rehash of all his past Shenanigans.

blu_n_a_redstate

Sep 20 2006

Now Stokes and the Melton-Heads are claiming that the house on Ridgeway was falling down anyway. Not True! How does Stokes know what kind of shape the home was in prior to demolition-day? (Had he been hanging out over there?) That's another example of blatant discrimination against poor black neighborhoods. 'Oh, if you live in THAT neighborhood, you couldn't possibly have any pride in the upkeep of your home.' What a crock!! If you take a look at pictures of the other side of the duplex, it looks like the paint job's in good condition, and I believe there's even a flowering hanging plant on the porch. I believe Minnie Rhodes has been reported as saying the duplex, prior to D-Day, was in good repair. These spins are sickening! And, the spinners should be ashamed.

JAR

Sep 20 2006

How is this Stokes' penned ordinance going to work, which allows the Mayor to tear down "suspected crack houses"...the operative word being "suspected"? AND, the homeowner will be held responsible for busting their own tenants?? Isn't that the police dept's job? I can just see Jennifer Sutton, a 37 year old single mom, dragging her kids down the street, while she's trying to take on the drug dealers in her neighborhood. I think that the Stokes ordinance is preposterous, just more Melton spin, and very possibly unconstitutional.

JAR

Sep 20 2006

One way to disprove this claim the house was in bad shape is to look at the transfer of ownership between Minnie Rhoads and Jennfier Sutton. There may well be a recent property appraisal, and that would include photos. We must upstage these lies one.at.a.time.

Cliff Cargill

Sep 20 2006

Mr. Cargill, I would not be surprised if there is NOT an appraisal. This is owner financing. The lenders typically require an appraisal. In this case the lender is the owner so there would be not much purpose in her having an appraisal conducted. I doubt there was an inspection either. I also have a feeling this was set up as a lease/purchase in a private transaction so normal things you would see in a mortgage transaction probably will not exist here.

Kingfish

Sep 20 2006

This house was not in bad shape. Not bad enough to be considered "falling down." Especially for a supposed crack house! You think a crack house would still have a stove?!? They fricking poured paint all over the house! What the heck is that? That is a man sending a message. If he had drugs he could have just arrested him, informed the landlady she needed to kick him out, and then conduct further sweeps. That is leadership! Nope this man took the lowest road possible by commandeering others to do his dirty work. That was cowardice.

pikersam

Sep 20 2006

I think that the Stokes ordinance is preposterous, just more Melton spin, and very possibly unconstitutional. When I heard about this on the news, I began wondering as to whether or not this could stand constitutional muster. The idea sounds great on paper and I think most people would support tearing down a suspected drug house if--and only if--evidence proves that it is and if there is a conviction. But even if a house is a suspected drug house, why does it have to be torn down? About a year or two ago, there was a house on or somewhere near Ridgewood Rd. that supposedly had a meth lab inside it. From the outside, the house looked very decent, almost like any other home you'd find in NE Jackson. There wouldn't be any real reason for the house to be torn down unless materials inside the home rendered it uninhabitable.

golden eagle

Sep 20 2006

This is from Orley Hood's CL column: Q: I think you're a weenie. You write all this stuff making fun of him, and now you're crying for him. I think you and Marshall Ramsey want to keep Frank because he provides y'all so much good material. A: I think Marshall hasn't had so much fun drawing cartoons since Fordice was governor. He should send Frank 10 percent of his pay. At the same time - and I understand Jim Hood gave Frank a second chance on the gun-toting business - I wouldn't be averse to him getting another chance. **He's a prideful man. I hate to think what the shame of being forced out of office would do to a man with such a big heart.** ARE YOU CRAZY, ORLEY??? This isn't a time to have 'FUN' at the expense of the citizens of Jackson! I'm sure that Evans Welch and Jennifer Sutton have pride and a heart as well...or does that not count, because they don't live in a neighborhood that suits your elitist standards? We're ALL equal, or SHOULD be, under the eyes of the law. That holds true for journalists as well. Other peoples foes shouldn't be fodder for your having 'fun' in your column. The TRUTH is what's important.

JAR

Sep 21 2006

How is this Stokes' penned ordinance going to work, which allows the Mayor to tear down "suspected crack houses"...the operative word being "suspected"? Did anyone see the interview with Kenneth Stokes on WAPT? BTW, I did not know he had been on the Council for 18 years. That means I was in junior high when he was first elected.

LatashaWillis

Sep 21 2006

On the face of it, Stokes' ordinance looks obviously unconstitutional. The government does not have the authority to punish people for a crime for which they haven't been convicted, and the government would not have the authority to destroy property owned by innocent third parties even after a conviction. Cheers, TH

Tom Head

Sep 21 2006

Could JFP post the Stokes "Order" passed by the City Council on Tuesday?I would like to read it.Aside from the likely procedural and substantive due process problems noted by other bloggers, I am concerned that the "Order" addresses a matter already covered by an existing Act of the Legislature(21-19-20) and thus the council is preempted from exercising its home rule powers.Also, the Order is actually an "ordinance" and thus cannot be implemented unless certain procedures are followed first, including publication in the newspaper prior to implememtation.This "Order" is the stuff that the ACLU was set up to scrutinize and determine if it"s enforcement needs to be enjoined by a state or federal judge. Notably Les and Ben voted no ,Margaret was absent and Marchand was out of the room or had left when the vote came up> Initially,Ben as council president decided to put the measure in a study committee but his decision was overturned by a motion to take up the order immediately which was voted on by the usual three.

chimneyville

Sep 21 2006

Ben and Les held the measure on a motion to reconsider so that it could taken up later but then withdrew the motion after Sarah said she would clean the order up with appropriate language so that it would pass legal muster.

chimneyville

Sep 21 2006

you people are starting to come around on Stokes. Not all of us who oppose him or want him gone are bigots.

Kingfish

Sep 21 2006

I've always disliked Stokes, but since I don't live in his ward I've tried not to say much about him. He was a joke to me before Melton came into office, but now I see him as a threat because he is becoming as reckless and arrogant in his interpretation of the law as Melton. But it is still the responsibility of Ward 3 to pass judgement on him, and I don't believe they are fed up with him enough to vote him out. Especially since the competition for his position isn't much better.

Jeff Lucas

Sep 21 2006

Props this week in the Memphis Flyer for Adam's original story that started all this—and they ran a picture of our cover from last week. ;-) http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/Content?oid=19679

DonnaLadd

Sep 22 2006

Chimney, we'll be happy to post that ordinance for all of you to consider it. I know we have some lawyers out there, though Ray is is trying to maintain morale by giving us dispatches from the pop-culture hash on all this. It is very suggestive to me that Evans added the parts of the ordinace that, you know, make it legal, behind close doors. So the council passed an ordinance without actually knowing what was in it. (It's important to note that the vote was 3-2, and Barrett-Simon was absent. Considering that she objected to the emergency item on this last week, it seems a fair assumption that she would have voted against the ordinance. I believe the other absent member was Crisler--I'm not at the office, where I can just yell out to Adam and check with our walking-talking council encyclopedia. If the full council had voted on the ordinance, it's doubtful it would have passed.) Evans has displayed a deep distrust of public scrutiny, judging from her response to public records requests and the way she has conducted her office. My presumption is that there is nothing nefarious in what she added; the ordinance itself is the problem. On the other hand, we shouldn't have to guess about these things. If the ordinance was incomplete, it was not ready for a vote. My impression is that it was patently unconstitutional as written and Evans had to "legal" it up. This does not make for good law. We'll have more on this for you soon.

Brian C Johnson

Sep 23 2006

"Somebody here threatening me?" Melton shouted at the house. "Here I am." Bad house. Bad, bad house! lol!

pikersam

Sep 26 2006

Ladd/iTodd/Someone: Your coverage on this topic is top notch! However, I am concerned about people being made aware of your coverage. It frustrates me to no end that every time I click the Jackson, MS section of my Google News page it is filled with nothing but CL stories. The world needs balance from JPF. I have a request. Please look at your SEO (Search Engine Optimization) policies and get better rankings at Google News. http://news.google.com/?geo=39206

charlesRom828

Jul 15 2008

Charles, those results have nothing to do with SEO. As someone fluent in SEO, the JFP actually has damn good search rankings when it comes to SEARCHING Jackson content in Google's engine. The Google News engine is primarily time-based. Notice the results.... 2 hrs ago... 4 hrs ago... The news algorithm gives weight to time *and* keyword. The web search gives weight to popularity, keyword density, relativity, and a million other factors. Since the JFP is a weekly publication and does not necessarily produce daily/hourly headlines (like the other so-called news outlets), its chance of hitting Google's news pages on a daily basis is slim. The headlines might show up on the initial publication date... I've never looked. Just Google Frank Melton... JFP is 3rd for that result while Wiki is 1st and Reason.com is 2nd. Those are damn fine ratings...

kaust

Jul 15 2008

I see. Never argued that the general search optimization wasn't up to snuff. Here's a challenge - is it possible for JFP to increase its position on the News searches - taking into consideration the rate at which stories are published? If it's possible, can, how and would JFP do it? Don't buy into thinking *solely* in terms of why things aren't a certain way or can't be done. Since you're fluent in SEO - I'd like to hear your take.

charlesRom828

Jul 15 2008

Charles, the writers would have to publish and/or re-publish stories relatively quickly to have Google pull it into the news. In general, the JFP is not really a headline-oriented periodical and focuses on the issues through commenting and comment updates (unless there's a major change in the story). This Google Search shows the JFP is listed in Google News but new headlines don't seem to be getting pulled often and have not been pulled or indexed since 9 Jul. Todd, if y'all are running a sitemap generator, you may wish to increase its update windows...

kaust

Jul 15 2008

That's almost right, Knol. ;-) Let me answer the Google News question, at least in a basic way. We are pulled in, but since we switched to our new site, and the "better" URLs, Google News does not recognize them unless we manually put a date at the end of them (we had to go figure out why we suddenly stopped appearing in Google News constantly and discovered this issue). We try to add the date everytime, but we miss some. However, when the indictments came down, we were among the earliest outlets in Google News, and would have been the first had they remembered to put the date in the breaking post! (Which came out at 4:30-ish, before TV News and well before the Ledger.) If you have an idea about how to make the dates appear automatically, please let us know. It's on the list of things to solve when they get to it. In regular Google, we tend to come up before the Ledger on major story coming out of Mississippi that we cover. ;-)

DonnaLadd

Jul 15 2008