Jackson Free Press

Make no mistake: The American Jobs Act introduced by President Obama last night in a fiery speech last night in Congress is one thing -- stimulus. It's exactly what we need and, finally, it's exactly what we're getting out of this president.

President Barack Obama's $447 billion job-creation plan would likely add 1.9 million payroll jobs and grow the U.S. economy 2 percent, a leading economist said.

The GOP's reaction? GOP Apparent Actual Majority Leader Eric Cantor didn't like the "tone" of the speech, but somebody's gotta tell these guys to get off their butts. Futzing with the debt ceiling all summer hasn't appeared to create any jobs.

Not only is it time to pivot from a ridiculous over-emphasis on austerity, but the American Jobs Act -- at least, to hear Obama say it -- puts stimulus in the hands of the people who can use it most: workers and small businesses.

"Should we keep tax loopholes for oil companies? Or should we use that money to give small business owners a tax credit when they hire new workers? Because we can't afford to do both. Should we keep tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires? Or should we put teachers back to work so our kids can graduate ready for college and good jobs? Right now, we can't afford to do both. ... These are real choices that we've got to make. And I'm pretty sure I know what most Americans would choose. It's not even close."

It's a jobless recovery for at least one (over-simplified) reason: Big business isn't hiring, and GOP-driven austerity is causing a decrease in government jobs. That means net "zero" last month and a revised-downward job-creation number the month before.

Who creates jobs? Small businesses do. The American Jobs Act would put more money in the pockets of workers and more money in the coffers of small businesses, particularly those that hire. Tax cuts? Hiring incentives? Infrastructure bank? Count us in. Get it done. Sign up.

But then I see a snippet on WLBT last night where Roger Wicker, senator from the Great State of Mississippi, says that the program won't work. His website offers insight and pristine clarity this morning:

"The President's proposals are not likely to make much difference in job creation," Wicker said. "He has made matters worse with excessive spending, a massive regulatory burden on job creators, and an unwillingness to use our own natural resources such as oil, natural gas, and coal. We need fewer federal regulations and more American energy."

1.) At this point, 1.9 million jobs would be nothing to sneeze at.

2.) Drill baby drill? That's Wicker's plan? Brilliant. Presumably we could get the whole thing figured out if we just get out of the way of ShellTexaMobBritishPetroleum and sit back to wait for our bright new future. (Am I the only one who remembers the Gulf Oil Spill? Or are we arguing that oil spills are stimulative because of the $20m grant Ole Miss got to study how bad the spill was?)

C'mon folks -- this is pretty simple. You've got a do-nothing Just-Say-No (thanks Nancy!) GOP that is getting in the way of us getting out of this Great Recession. We've been right here in this country before, when the government tried to reign in recovery programs too soon, to devastating effect. Now is the moment "go long" on a program that will rebuild infrastructure, put spendable dollars in people's pockets and -- most of all -- put the recovery in the hands of small businesses that create jobs in THIS country because that's where WE are.

It's time for phase two in the "War on the Great Recession," and the solution isn't drowning government in a bathtub, nor should we spend much more time claiming that up is down or that 2 + 2 = 5. What Obama said last night was stuff that everyone needs to hear and not everyone wants to *including* the idea of reforming entitlements and regulation -- things Dems don't love to talk about.

But part of the solution has to be retooling taxes on high earners and corporations, stimulating hiring by small businesses (or *American* businesses, whatever the size), and keeping enough cash in the pockets of American families and workers so that their heads stay above water while they re-tool, re-focus and everyone gets back in the game.

As the president of the United States said last night, "All of us will have to up our game."

That means you, too, Mr. Wicker. Get in the game.

Previous Comments

ID

164889

Comment

According to OpenSecrets.org, Wicker's second largest source of funding is the Oil and Gas industry, behind only "Lawyers/Law Firms." http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=n00003280 Given that fact, it's interesting that he'd focus on oil and gas as the solution to our jobs crisis, isn't it? This despite the fact that a significant number of our unemployed might, for instance, not be qualified or trained for oil and gas jobs. Also interesting -- the largest organizational contributor group to Wicker is Telapex employees, which is the holding company for Cellular South. Second largest is USAA, the military focused insurance company. (Wicker is on the Armed Services and Veterans Affairs committees.) Third is BGR -- Barbour's "old" lobbying firm, with $28,800 from individuals associated with the firm; fourth is employees of the State of Mississippi (not sure that includes politicians?); fifth is Bancorpsouth. (Wicker sits on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs as well.) 3% of Wicker's funding comes from small individual contributions; 35% from PACs.

Author

Todd Stauffer

Date

2011-09-12T10:12:01-06:00

ID

164902

Comment

At Daily Beast, Andrew Romano writes Obama's Jobs Bill Beats GOP Plans... if It Can Survive Congress. Which brings us to President Obama and the American Jobs Act. Unlike his Republican rivals, Obama has actually put forth a plan that would create or save jobs in the short-term. By cutting the payroll tax in half for 98 percent of businesses, offering employers a complete payroll-tax holiday for added workers or increased wages, and providing $140 billion for modernizing schools and repairing roads and bridges, the AJA would “add 2 percentage points to economic growth next year and bring down the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point compared with current policy,” according to John McCain’s economic adviser, Mark Zandi. (emphasis mine) And why won't it happen? Roger Wicker. (And his friends, of course.) Speaking to Politico this morning, a House GOP aide explained why: “Obama is on the ropes; why do we appear ready to hand him a win?” Ah, so that's it. That's why they won't help out the unemployed, small businesses, schools and U.S. infrastructure. Got it.

Author

Todd Stauffer

Date

2011-09-12T13:39:58-06:00

ID

164903

Comment

Unbelievable. It's unconscionable.

Author

DonnaLadd

Date

2011-09-12T13:47:12-06:00

ID

164912

Comment

For those that haven't done it before, the house has a directory of the Representatives and their contact information at http://www.house.gov/representatives/#state_ms Related, to find out which one is yours, go to https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml You'll need your zip+4 to be sure if you don't already. And last but not least, don't forget our Senators http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm?State=MS Give 'em all some love, and let 'em know that people care about these bills. Also, from what I understand, e-mail is fine. Its easy and fast. But calling their offices gets the attention of the staff and legislators in a big way. Last but not least, please be polite. It prevents contacts from being filed in the crank bin.

Author

Pilgrim

Date

2011-09-12T17:35:50-06:00

ID

164967

Comment

Looks like the Gulf Coast oil-and-gas representatives are circling the wagons over the Jobs bill. Mary Landrieu (D-LA) says she opposes the Jobs bill if it does away with oil industry subsidies. And at least one lawmaker is objecting to the president's plan to pay for the legislation in part by ending tax subsidies for the oil industry. "I have said for months that I am not supporting a repeal of tax cuts for the oil industry unless there are other industries that contribute," Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) told the New York Times. Of course, Oil and Gas are huge contributors to Landrieu -- she's raised over at least $450,000 from the industry, eclipsed only by lawyers and law firms. (Why does that sound familiar -- oh, yeah, that's the mix that Wicker has, too.)

Author

Todd Stauffer

Date

2011-09-16T11:01:39-06:00

ID

165010

Comment

We need to change out our supposed Representatives in the U.S. House and Senate for people who actually may represent the Citizens of Mississippi's bests interests.

Author

BobbyKearan

Date

2011-09-21T12:43:41-06:00